Executors of Keese v. Fullerton

2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 16
CourtNew York Circuit Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1848
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 16 (Executors of Keese v. Fullerton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Executors of Keese v. Fullerton, 2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 16 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1848).

Opinion

Edmonds, J.:

The last objection may be disregarded under section 151 of the Oode, because the averment complained of does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. But the other objection is more material, in this, that the complaint may all be true, and still the plaintiffs not be entitled to recover. To entitle them to recover they must aver and prove, not merely that the defendants received, under the assignment, enough to pay their debt, but enough to pay the prior claims for expenses and rent, and the plaintiffs’ debt. I will not, however, dismiss the complaint on that account; the plaintiffs may amend it, by inserting the necessary averments, on payment of the costs of this trial, the defendants to have twenty days to answer the amended complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executors-of-keese-v-fullerton-nycirct-1848.