Executors of Howe v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Vermont

Executors of Howe v. Pratt

11 Vt. 255

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJanuary 15, 1839

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 11 Vt. 255 (Executors of Howe v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Executors of Howe v. Pratt, 11 Vt. 255 (Vt. 1839).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Williams, Ch. J.

As a general rule, what is here termed a plea would undoubtedly be liable to the objections, which are raised against it, if there were anything before the court to which a plea would be required. But as the appellants have set forth no objections to the decree of the court of probate, and have made no allegation that any will was made by the deceased in his lifetime, it was not necessary for the appellees to do anything more, or to show any other reason for the affirmance of the decree of the probate court, than to make the general allegation which they have made. The allegation or plea was therefore sufficient, as the case then stood before the court, and the appellants, instead of demurring, should have stated some reasons or facts to show that the decree of the court of probate should be reversed.

Whenever an appeal is taken from the sentence or decree of a court of probate, the person complaining of the decree should state, in writing, his objections thereto, and this lays the foundation for all the after proceedings. To these objections the appellee can answer, and thus present the questions to be decided, whether they be of fact or law. When the appeal is taken from the approval of a will, as it most commonly is, the objections filed present the questions which are to be decided, as to the due execution, the sanity of the testator, &c. This appeal is from the other side, and the objections filed should have averred the making and execution of the will. The answer to these objections would have raised all the questions, which are [257]*257intended to be litigated in this case. Unless the pleadings are altered, the decree of the court of probate must be affirmed.

The appellants, by leave of the court, withdrew the demurrer, and filed their objections to the decree, and the issues formed thereon were sent to the county court for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Williams, Ch. J.

As a general rule, what is here termed a plea would undoubtedly be liable to the objections, which are raised against it, if there were anything before the court to which a plea would be required. But as the appellants have set forth no objections to the decree of the court of probate, and have made no allegation that any will was made by the deceased in his lifetime, it was not necessary for the appellees to do anything more, or to show any other reason for the affirmance of the decree of the probate court, than to make the general allegation which they have made. The allegation or plea was therefore sufficient, as the case then stood before the court, and the appellants, instead of demurring, should have stated some reasons or facts to show that the decree of the court of probate should be reversed.

Whenever an appeal is taken from the sentence or decree of a court of probate, the person complaining of the decree should state, in writing, his objections thereto, and this lays the foundation for all the after proceedings. To these objections the appellee can answer, and thus present the questions to be decided, whether they be of fact or law. When the appeal is taken from the approval of a will, as it most commonly is, the objections filed present the questions which are to be decided, as to the due execution, the sanity of the testator, &c. This appeal is from the other side, and the objections filed should have averred the making and execution of the will. The answer to these objections would have raised all the questions, which are [257]*257intended to be litigated in this case. Unless the pleadings are altered, the decree of the court of probate must be affirmed.

The appellants, by leave of the court, withdrew the demurrer, and filed their objections to the decree, and the issues formed thereon were sent to the county court for trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Vt. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executors-of-howe-v-pratt-vt-1839.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack