Executors of Dry v. Executors of Roper
This text of 1 N.C. 311 (Executors of Dry v. Executors of Roper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of opinion that the plaintiff is barred by the act of 1715, referred to, more than seven years having elapsed from the death of the debtor before this suit was brought.
Judgment for defendant.
It is proper here to be remarked by the reporters, that in the case of Ogden, administrator, &c. Blackledge, executor, &c. which went to the Supreme Court of the United States, from the Circuit Court of North Carolina, it was determined that the act of 1715 was repealed by an act passed in 1789, and therefore no bar to a recovery in a case such as the foregoing.—It is much to be regretted that, on such an important question, such different decisions have been made, and that the right of recovery in such a case, should depend on the mere circumstance of the plaintiff being entitled or not to sue in the Court of the United States.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.C. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executors-of-dry-v-executors-of-roper-nc-1801.