Executors of Darroch v. Administrators of Hay

2 Yeates 208
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 15, 1797
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2 Yeates 208 (Executors of Darroch v. Administrators of Hay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Executors of Darroch v. Administrators of Hay, 2 Yeates 208 (Pa. 1797).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The set-off cannot be allowed. It could not be declared on as a debt due to the intestate; it could not be pleaded as such to this suit; it became the private debt of the administrators, on the purchase of the check. It is clearly settled that the debts which can be set-off must be such as are duo in the same right. Bull. 179, 180. Espin. 239, 240.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

The Judges sat on the first day of September Term 1797; but a malignant infectious fever prevailing in the city of Philadelphia, attended with considerable mortality, the Court adjourned to the last day of the term. No other business was done, except taking the Sheriffs returns and entering the ordinary rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kenin's Estate
29 A.2d 495 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Kenin's Estate
45 Pa. D. & C. 333 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1942)
Casper v. Thigpen
48 Miss. 635 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1873)
Stuart v. Commonwealth
8 Watts 74 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1839)
Potter v. Burd
4 Watts 15 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1835)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Yeates 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executors-of-darroch-v-administrators-of-hay-pa-1797.