Executors of Darroch v. Administrators of Hay

2 Yeates 208
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 1797·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

The set-off cannot be allowed. It could not be declared on as a debt due to the intestate; it could not be pleaded as such to this suit; it became the private debt of the administrators, on the purchase of the check. It is clearly settled that the debts which can be set-off must be such as are duo in the same right. Bull. 179, 180. Espin. 239, 240.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

The Judges sat on the first day of September Term 1797; but a malignant infectious fever prevailing in the city of Philadelphia, attended with considerable mortality, the Court adjourned to the last day of the term. No other business was done, except taking the Sheriffs returns and entering the ordinary rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Executors of Darroch v. Administrators of Hay, 2 Yeates 208 (Pa. 1797).

2 Yeates 208 (Executors of Darroch v. Administrators of Hay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kenin's Estate
29 A.2d 495 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Kenin's Estate
45 Pa. D. & C. 333 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1942)
Casper v. Thigpen
48 Miss. 635 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1873)
Stuart v. Commonwealth
8 Watts 74 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1839)
Potter v. Burd
4 Watts 15 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1835)