Executors of Brewton v. Executors of Cannon

1 S.C.L. 482
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJuly 1, 1795
StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C.L. 482 (Executors of Brewton v. Executors of Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Executors of Brewton v. Executors of Cannon, 1 S.C.L. 482 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1795).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is a good general rule, and no doubt, good law, that if no interest has been paid on a bond Tor twenty years, it shall be presumed to be satisfied 5 and in such case, the defendant may plead solvit ad diem, and rely on the presumption. But war, and the variety of distresses occasioned by a revolution, alter the situation of a country greadv •, and therefore, all these circumstances should have been permitted to have gone to a jury, to judge whether the presumption was so strong as to warrant them to find for the plaintiff, or not.

Bay, J.

assented, after argument, on account of the peculiar circumstances of the country, during and for some time after the war; though, on the trial, he conceived himself bound bj? the rules of law laid down in the books.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 S.C.L. 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executors-of-brewton-v-executors-of-cannon-pactcompl-1795.