Executors of Baker v. Executors of Jenys

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Executors of Baker v. Executors of Jenys

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 399

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 23, 1745

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 399 (Executors of Baker v. Executors of Jenys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Executors of Baker v. Executors of Jenys, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 399 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1745).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion of Mr. Graeme of Council for the Complainants in this Cause praying that the Exceptions taken to the Defendants Answer might be admitted to be Filed with the Register of this Court, And the same being Opposed by the Defendants Council; Upon a full Debate of the whole Matter and hearing all that could be alledged by Council learned on both sides, The Court was unanimously of Opinion, and therefore Doth Order that the said Exceptions be allowed to be filed, And that the Same be Set down to be Argued on Thursday the Sixteenth of May next of which all Parties concerned are to take Notice.

Int.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register

Present the same day, besides the above Members, The Honorable Richard Hill Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion of Mr. Graeme of Council for the Complainants in this Cause praying that the Exceptions taken to the Defendants Answer might be admitted to be Filed with the Register of this Court, And the same being Opposed by the Defendants Council; Upon a full Debate of the whole Matter and hearing all that could be alledged by Council learned on both sides, The Court was unanimously of Opinion, and therefore Doth Order that the said Exceptions be allowed to be filed, And that the Same be Set down to be Argued on Thursday the Sixteenth of May next of which all Parties concerned are to take Notice.

Int.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register

Present the same day, besides the above Members, The Honorable Richard Hill Esq.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executors-of-baker-v-executors-of-jenys-ctchansc-1745.