Executive Sq., Ltd. v. Delray Executive Sq., Ltd.
This text of 546 So. 2d 434 (Executive Sq., Ltd. v. Delray Executive Sq., Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
EXECUTIVE SQUARE, LTD., Appellant,
v.
DELRAY EXECUTIVE SQUARE, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
William J. Barnes of Gilbride, Heller & Brown, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Margaret L. Cooper of Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We find no merit in appellant's argument that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction when it entered its order requiring appellant to deposit rents into the registry of the court. The assignment of rents became absolute upon appellant's default and operative upon written demand by appellee. § 697.07, Fla. Stat. (1987). Appellant quoted part of section 697.07 but failed to quote the operative language which provides:
A mortgage may provide for an assignment of rents. If such assignment is made, such assignment shall be absolute upon the mortgagor's default, becoming operative upon written demand made by the mortgagee.
See also In re Aloma Square, Inc., 85 B.R. 623 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Fla. 1988); In re Mears, 88 B.R. 419 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla. 1988).
We find no merit in appellant's remaining points on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 So. 2d 434, 1989 WL 69124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executive-sq-ltd-v-delray-executive-sq-ltd-fladistctapp-1989.