Executive Motors, Inc. v. Citizens National Bank of Orlando

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Executive Motors, Inc. v. Citizens National Bank of Orlando

273 So. 2d 93

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1973·No. No. 72-282·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion to transfer on the ground that the plaintiff had selected an improper venue. The defendant did not carry the burden of demonstrating that the plaintiff had chosen an improper venue. The order of the trial court, therefore, is affirmed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. National Bank of Melbourne & Trust Co., Fla.App.1970, 238 So.2d 665.

REED, C. J., OWEN, J., and SILVER-TOOTH, LYNN N., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion to transfer on the ground that the plaintiff had selected an improper venue. The defendant did not carry the burden of demonstrating that the plaintiff had chosen an improper venue. The order of the trial court, therefore, is affirmed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. National Bank of Melbourne & Trust Co., Fla.App.1970, 238 So.2d 665.

REED, C. J., OWEN, J., and SILVER-TOOTH, LYNN N., Associate Judge, concur.

Executive Motors, Inc. v. Citizens National Bank of Orlando, 273 So. 2d 93 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

273 So. 2d 93 (Executive Motors, Inc. v. Citizens National Bank of Orlando) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related