UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (CINCINNATI)
EXECUTIVE JET MANAGEMENT, INC., : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:21-cv-74 : v. : Judge Susan J. Dlott : LONGBOW ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al., : Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz : Defendants. :
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ joint request that the Court enter this Order, and their agreement that the following limitations and restrictions should apply to documents and information produced for inspection and copying during the course of this litigation (the “Action”), the Court hereby ORDERS that: 1. Scope. This Protective Order (hereinafter “Protective Order” or “Order”) shall apply to all documents or other information produced in the course of discovery in this Action that have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” pursuant to this Order, including but not limited to, all initial disclosures, all responses to discovery requests, all deposition testimony and exhibits, and all materials (including documents or testimony) produced by non-parties in this Action, including all copies, excerpts, and summaries thereof (collectively the “Confidential Information”). 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Protective Order is to protect against the unnecessary disclosure of Confidential Information and to facilitate discovery by eliminating the need for repeated requests that the Court become directly involved in the discovery process. 3. Disclosure Defined. As used herein, “disclosure” or “to disclose” means to divulge, reveal, describe, summarize, paraphrase, quote, transmit, or otherwise communicate Confidential Information, and the restrictions contained herein regarding disclosure of Confidential Information also apply with equal force to any copies, excerpts, analyses, or
summaries of such materials or the information contained therein, as well as to any pleadings, briefs, exhibits, transcripts or other documents which may be prepared in connection with this Action which contain or refer to the Confidential Information or information contained therein. 4. Designating Material As Confidential. Any party, or any third party subpoenaed by one of the parties or producing information in the course of discovery in this Action (the “Designating Party”), may designate as confidential and subject to this Protective Order any documents, testimony, written responses, or other materials produced in this Action if they contain information that the Designating Party asserts in good faith is protected from disclosure by statute or common law, including, but not limited to, confidential personal information, medical or psychiatric information, trade secrets, personnel records, or such other sensitive commercial
information that is not publicly available. Information that is publicly available may not be designated as confidential. The designation of materials as confidential pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order does not mean that the document or other material has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order. 5. Form and Timing Of Designation. a. Documents And Written Materials. A person or entity producing documents or information in the course of discovery in this Action (a “Producing Party”) shall designate any document or other written materials as confidential pursuant to this Order by marking each page of the material with a stamp identifying it as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” if practical to do so. The Producing Party shall place the stamp, to the extent possible, in such a manner that it will not interfere with the legibility of the document. Materials shall be so-designated prior to, or at the time of, their production or disclosure.
A Designating Party that is not a Producing Party may also designate any document or other written material produced in the course of discovery in this Action as confidential pursuant to this Order. A Designating Party shall do so by designating in a transmittal letter or email to the Producing Party and any other party to whom the materials were produced (a “Receiving Party”) using a reasonable identifier (e.g., the Bates range) any portions of the production that should be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” b. Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”): If a production response includes ESI, the Producing Party shall make an effort to include within the electronic files themselves the designation “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
to the extent practicable. If that is not practicable, then the Producing Party shall designate in a transmittal letter or email to the Receiving Party(ies) using a reasonable identifier (e.g., the Bates range) any portions of the ESI that should be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” A Designating Party that is not a Producing Party may also designate any production response that includes ESI as confidential pursuant to this Order. A Designating Party shall do so by designating in a transmittal letter or email to the Producing Party and any Receiving Parties using a reasonable identifier (e.g., the Bates range) any portions of the ESI that should be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” c. Deposition Testimony. Deposition testimony will be deemed confidential only if designated as such when the deposition is taken or within five (5) business days after receipt of the deposition transcript. Such designation must be specific as to the
portions of the transcript and/or any exhibits to be protected, except that any exhibit that has previously been marked as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” at the time of production, and which still bears that mark at the time of its use in a deposition, shall be treated as Confidential Information under this Order without further designation. All deposition testimony will be deemed and treated as Confidential Information until five (5) business days after receipt of the deposition transcript, in which case, only those portions designated in accordance with this paragraph 5(c) will be treated as Confidential Information. 6. Limitation Of Use.
a. General Protections. All Confidential Information, including all information derived therefrom, shall be used solely for purposes of prosecuting or defending this Action. Confidential Information shall not be used or disclosed for any other purpose, including but not limited to any business, commercial, or competitive purpose. Except as set forth in this Order, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any third party. This Order shall not prevent the Designating Party from using or disclosing information it has designated as Confidential Information, and that belongs to the Designating Party, for any purpose that the Designating Party deems appropriate, except that the Designating Party’s voluntary disclosure of Confidential Information outside the scope of this Action may impact the protection that this Order would otherwise provide with regard to such information, once disclosed. b. Persons To Whom Confidential Information May Be Disclosed. Use of Confidential Information, including all information derived therefrom, shall be restricted
solely to the following persons who agree to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order, unless additional persons are stipulated by counsel or authorized by the Court: 1. outside counsel of record for the parties, and the administrative staff of outside counsel's firms;
2. in-house counsel for the parties, and the administrative staff for each in- house counsel;
3. any party to this action who is an individual;
4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (CINCINNATI)
EXECUTIVE JET MANAGEMENT, INC., : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:21-cv-74 : v. : Judge Susan J. Dlott : LONGBOW ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al., : Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz : Defendants. :
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ joint request that the Court enter this Order, and their agreement that the following limitations and restrictions should apply to documents and information produced for inspection and copying during the course of this litigation (the “Action”), the Court hereby ORDERS that: 1. Scope. This Protective Order (hereinafter “Protective Order” or “Order”) shall apply to all documents or other information produced in the course of discovery in this Action that have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” pursuant to this Order, including but not limited to, all initial disclosures, all responses to discovery requests, all deposition testimony and exhibits, and all materials (including documents or testimony) produced by non-parties in this Action, including all copies, excerpts, and summaries thereof (collectively the “Confidential Information”). 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Protective Order is to protect against the unnecessary disclosure of Confidential Information and to facilitate discovery by eliminating the need for repeated requests that the Court become directly involved in the discovery process. 3. Disclosure Defined. As used herein, “disclosure” or “to disclose” means to divulge, reveal, describe, summarize, paraphrase, quote, transmit, or otherwise communicate Confidential Information, and the restrictions contained herein regarding disclosure of Confidential Information also apply with equal force to any copies, excerpts, analyses, or
summaries of such materials or the information contained therein, as well as to any pleadings, briefs, exhibits, transcripts or other documents which may be prepared in connection with this Action which contain or refer to the Confidential Information or information contained therein. 4. Designating Material As Confidential. Any party, or any third party subpoenaed by one of the parties or producing information in the course of discovery in this Action (the “Designating Party”), may designate as confidential and subject to this Protective Order any documents, testimony, written responses, or other materials produced in this Action if they contain information that the Designating Party asserts in good faith is protected from disclosure by statute or common law, including, but not limited to, confidential personal information, medical or psychiatric information, trade secrets, personnel records, or such other sensitive commercial
information that is not publicly available. Information that is publicly available may not be designated as confidential. The designation of materials as confidential pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order does not mean that the document or other material has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order. 5. Form and Timing Of Designation. a. Documents And Written Materials. A person or entity producing documents or information in the course of discovery in this Action (a “Producing Party”) shall designate any document or other written materials as confidential pursuant to this Order by marking each page of the material with a stamp identifying it as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” if practical to do so. The Producing Party shall place the stamp, to the extent possible, in such a manner that it will not interfere with the legibility of the document. Materials shall be so-designated prior to, or at the time of, their production or disclosure.
A Designating Party that is not a Producing Party may also designate any document or other written material produced in the course of discovery in this Action as confidential pursuant to this Order. A Designating Party shall do so by designating in a transmittal letter or email to the Producing Party and any other party to whom the materials were produced (a “Receiving Party”) using a reasonable identifier (e.g., the Bates range) any portions of the production that should be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” b. Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”): If a production response includes ESI, the Producing Party shall make an effort to include within the electronic files themselves the designation “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
to the extent practicable. If that is not practicable, then the Producing Party shall designate in a transmittal letter or email to the Receiving Party(ies) using a reasonable identifier (e.g., the Bates range) any portions of the ESI that should be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” A Designating Party that is not a Producing Party may also designate any production response that includes ESI as confidential pursuant to this Order. A Designating Party shall do so by designating in a transmittal letter or email to the Producing Party and any Receiving Parties using a reasonable identifier (e.g., the Bates range) any portions of the ESI that should be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” c. Deposition Testimony. Deposition testimony will be deemed confidential only if designated as such when the deposition is taken or within five (5) business days after receipt of the deposition transcript. Such designation must be specific as to the
portions of the transcript and/or any exhibits to be protected, except that any exhibit that has previously been marked as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” at the time of production, and which still bears that mark at the time of its use in a deposition, shall be treated as Confidential Information under this Order without further designation. All deposition testimony will be deemed and treated as Confidential Information until five (5) business days after receipt of the deposition transcript, in which case, only those portions designated in accordance with this paragraph 5(c) will be treated as Confidential Information. 6. Limitation Of Use.
a. General Protections. All Confidential Information, including all information derived therefrom, shall be used solely for purposes of prosecuting or defending this Action. Confidential Information shall not be used or disclosed for any other purpose, including but not limited to any business, commercial, or competitive purpose. Except as set forth in this Order, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any third party. This Order shall not prevent the Designating Party from using or disclosing information it has designated as Confidential Information, and that belongs to the Designating Party, for any purpose that the Designating Party deems appropriate, except that the Designating Party’s voluntary disclosure of Confidential Information outside the scope of this Action may impact the protection that this Order would otherwise provide with regard to such information, once disclosed. b. Persons To Whom Confidential Information May Be Disclosed. Use of Confidential Information, including all information derived therefrom, shall be restricted
solely to the following persons who agree to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order, unless additional persons are stipulated by counsel or authorized by the Court: 1. outside counsel of record for the parties, and the administrative staff of outside counsel's firms;
2. in-house counsel for the parties, and the administrative staff for each in- house counsel;
3. any party to this action who is an individual;
4. as to any party to this action who is not an individual, every employee, director, officer, or manager of that party, but only to the extent necessary to further the interest of a party in this Action;
5. independent consultants or expert witnesses (including partners, associates and employees of the firm which employs such consultant or expert) retained by a party or its attorneys for purposes of this Action, but only to the extent necessary to further the interest of the parties in this Action, and only after such persons have completed the certification attached hereto as Attachment A, Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement to be Bound;
6. the Court and its personnel, including, but not limited to, stenographic reporters regularly employed by the Court and stenographic reporters not regularly employed by the Court who are engaged by the Court or the parties during this Action;
7. the authors and the original recipients of the documents;
8. any court reporter or videographer reporting a deposition;
9. employees of copy services, microfilming or database services, trial support firms, and/or translators who are engaged by the parties for the litigation of this Action and only after such persons have completed the certification attached hereto as Attachment A, Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement to be Bound; 10. interviewees, potential witnesses, deponents, hearing or trial witnesses, and any other person, where counsel for a party to this action in good faith determines the individual should be provided access to such information in order for counsel to more effectively prosecute or defend this Action (as long as the disclosure occurs in the presence of counsel, and copies, duplicates, images, or the like are not removed or retained by any interviewee, potential witness, deponent, or hearing or trial witness), provided, however, that in all such cases the individual to whom disclosure is to be made has been informed that the information contained in the disclosed document(s) is confidential and protected by Court Order, that the individual understands that he/she is prohibited from disclosing any information contained in the document(s) to anyone; or
11. any other person agreed to in writing by the parties. Prior to being shown any Confidential Information, any person listed under paragraph 6(b)(1)-(5) and (7)-(10) shall be advised that the Confidential Information is being disclosed pursuant to and subject to the terms of this Protective Order. 7. Inadvertent Production. Inadvertent production of any document or information in the course of discovery in this Action shall be governed by Fed. R. Evid. 502. Pursuant to subsections (d) and (e) of that Rule, the parties agree to, and the Court orders, protection of Protected Information against claims of waiver (including as against third parties and in other Federal and State proceedings) in the event such information is produced during the course of discovery in the Action, whether pursuant to a Court order, a parties’ discovery request, or informal production, as follows: a. the production of documents, information or ESI (including, without limitation, metadata) subject to a legally recognized claim of privilege or other protection from production or other disclosure (collectively, “Protected Information”), including without limitation the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine, shall in no way constitute the voluntary disclosure of such Protected Information;
b. the production of Protected Information shall not result in the waiver of any privilege or protection associated with such Protected Information as to the Receiving Party, or any third parties otherwise in receipt of the Protected Information, and shall not result in any waiver of protection, including subject matter waiver, of any kind;
c. if any document or ESI (including, without limitation, metadata) received by a Receiving Party is on its face clearly subject to a legally recognizable privilege, immunity, or other right not to produce such information, the Receiving Party will promptly notify the Producing Party in writing that it has discovered Protected Information, identify the Protected Information by Bates Number range, and return or sequester such Protected Information until the Producing Party confirms whether it does indeed assert any privilege protecting this information. Once the Producing Party asserts privilege over such Protected Information (as described in Subparagraph (e) below), the Receiving Party will return, sequester, or destroy all copies of such Protected Information, along with any notes, abstracts or compilations of the content thereof, within ten (10) business days of notice from the Producing Party;
d. upon the request of the Producing Party, the Receiving Party will promptly disclose the names of any individuals who have read or have had access to the Protected Information;
e. if the Producing Party intends to assert a claim of privilege or other protection over Protected Information identified by the Receiving Party, the Producing Party will, within ten (10) business days of receiving the Receiving Party’s written notification, inform the Receiving Party of such intention in writing and shall provide the Receiving Party with a log for such Protected Information that is consistent with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, setting forth the basis for the claim of privilege, immunity or basis for non-disclosure, and in the event, if any portion of the Protected Information does not contain privileged or protected information, the Producing Party shall also provide to the Receiving Party a redacted copy of the Protected Information that omits the information that the Producing Party believes is subject to a claim of privilege, immunity or other protection;
f. if, during the course of the Action, a Producing Party determines it has produced Protected Information, the Producing Party may notify the Receiving Party(ies) of such production in writing. The Producing Party’s written notice must identify the Protected Information by Bates Number range, the privilege or protection claimed, and the basis for the assertion of the privilege and shall provide the Receiving Party with a log for such Protected Information that is consistent with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, setting forth the basis for the claim of privilege, immunity or basis for non-disclosure, and in the event any portion of the Protected Information does not contain privileged or protected information, the Producing Party shall also provide to the Receiving Party a redacted copy of the Protected Information that omits the information that the Producing Party believes is subject to a claim of privilege, immunity or other protection. The Producing Party must also demand the return of the Protected Information. After receiving such written notification, the Receiving Party must, within ten (10) business days of receiving the written notification, return, sequester, or destroy the specified Protected Information and any copies, along with any notes, abstracts or compilations of the content thereof;
g. a Receiving Party’s return, sequestration, or destruction of such Protected Information as provided in the Subparagraphs above will not act as a waiver of the Receiving Party’s right to move for the production of the returned, sequestered, or destroyed Protected Information on grounds that the Protected Information is not in fact subject to a viable claim of privilege or other protection. However, the Receiving Party is prohibited and estopped from arguing that the Producing Party’s production of the Protected Information in this matter acts as a waiver of applicable privileges or protections, that the disclosure of the Protected Information by the Producing Party was not inadvertent, that the Producing Party did not take reasonable steps to prevent the disclosure of the Protected Information, or that the Producing Party did not take reasonable steps to rectify such disclosure; and
h. nothing contained herein is intended to or shall limit a Producing Party’s right to conduct a review of documents or ESI (including, without limitation, metadata), for relevance, responsiveness, and/or the segregation of privileged and/or protected information before such information is produced to the Receiving Party. 8. Filing Materials Containing Information Designated Confidential. In the event a person or entity seeks to file with the Court any Confidential Information, that person or entity must take appropriate action to ensure that the document receives proper protection from public disclosure, including: (a) filing a redacted document with the consent of the Designating Party; (b) where appropriate (e.g., in relation to discovery and evidentiary motions), submitting the document solely for in camera review; or (c) when the preceding measures are inadequate, seeking permission to file the document under seal by filing a motion for leave to file under seal. Any motion to file a document subject to this Order under seal must meet the Sixth Circuit’s standard set forth in Shane Group, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299 (6th Cir. 2016). The burden of demonstrating the need for and appropriateness of a sealing order is borne by the moving party, and requires the moving party to analyze in detail, document by document, the propriety of secrecy, providing reasons and legal citations. Regardless of whether the parties agree, it remains the Court’s independent obligation to determine whether a seal is appropriate for any given document or portion thereof. Any proposed sealing, even when compelling reasons exist, must be narrowly tailored to serve the compelling reasons. When a person or entity seeks to file documents containing Confidential Information is not a Designating Party, the filing party shall provide the Designating Party or Parties with written
notification of its intent to file such documents at least (14) fourteen days before doing so. After being provided such notice, the Designating Party or Parties will then have (7) seven days to file with the Court a motion for sealing. The Court will rule on the motion as promptly as possible. 9. Attorneys Allowed To Provide Advice. Nothing in this Order shall bar or otherwise restrict any attorney from rendering advice to his or her client with respect to this Action or from doing anything necessary to prosecute or defend this Action or furthering the interests of his or her client as those interests relate to this Action, except for the disclosure of the Confidential Information as proscribed in this Order. 10. Excluding Others From Access. Whenever Confidential Information is to be discussed at a deposition, the Designating Party may exclude from the room any person, other than
persons designated in Paragraph 6 of this Order and attorneys for the deponent, for that portion of the deposition. 11. No Voluntary Disclosure To Other Entities. No person or entity may voluntarily disclose any Confidential Information to any state or federal law enforcement or regulatory agency, or any employee thereof, except in this Action as set forth in Paragraph 6 of this Order or as otherwise commanded by law or provided in this Order. Nothing in this Order shall prevent a person or entity from providing information in its possession in response to a valid order or subpoena from a law enforcement or regulatory agency requiring the production of such information, except that, prior to such production, the person or entity producing the information shall provide as much advance notice as possible to the Designating Party(ies) to facilitate the Designating Party’s efforts to preserve the confidentiality of the material. 12. Disputes As To Designations. Each party has the right to dispute the confidential status claimed by any Designating Party in accordance with this Protective Order. If a party
believes that any documents or materials have been inappropriately designated by a Designating Party, that party shall confer with the Designating Party. As part of that conferral, the Designating Party must assess whether redaction is a viable alternative to complete non-disclosure. If any person or entity challenges the “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” designation of any document or information, the burden to properly maintain the designation shall, at all times, remain with the Designating Party(ies) to show that said document or information should remain protected pursuant to Federal Civil Rule 26(c). In the event of disagreement, then the Designating Party shall file a motion pursuant to Federal Civil Rule 26(c) within fourteen (14) days of the meet and confer. Any person or entity who disagrees with the designation must nevertheless abide by that designation until the matter is resolved by agreement of the involved
parties or by order of the Court. 13. Information Security Protections. Any Receiving Party shall maintain an information security program that includes reasonable administrative, technical, and physical safeguards designed to protect the security and confidentiality of Confidential Information, protect against any reasonably anticipated threats or hazards to the security of Confidential Information, and protect against unauthorized access to or use of Confidential Information. If the Receiving Party discovers a breach of security, including any actual or suspected unauthorized access, to Confidential Information, they shall: (1) notify the Designating Party of such breach; (2) investigate and take reasonable efforts to remediate the effects of the breach; and (3) provide sufficient information about the breach that the Designating Party can reasonably ascertain the size and scope of the breach. The Receiving Party agrees to cooperate with the Designating Party or law enforcement in investigating any such security incident. In any event, the Receiving Party shall promptly take all necessary and appropriate corrective action to terminate
the unauthorized access. 14. All Trials Open To Public. All trials, and certain pretrial proceedings and hearings, are open to the public (collectively a “Public Hearing” or “Public Hearings”). Absent further order of the Court, there will be no restrictions on any Party’s ability to use during a Public Hearing any Confidential Information. However, if any person or entity intends to present at a Public Hearing any Confidential Information, the person or entity intending to present such document or information shall provide advance notice to the Designating Party at least (5) five days before the Public Hearing by identifying the documents or information at issue as specifically as possible (i.e., by Bates Number, page range, deposition transcript line, etc.). Any person or entity may then seek appropriate relief from the Court regarding restrictions on the use of such
documents or information at trial, or sealing of the courtroom, if appropriate. 15. No Waiver Of Right To Object. This Order does not limit the right of any person or entity to object to the scope of discovery in this Action. 16. No Determination Of Admissibility. This Order does not constitute a determination of the admissibility or evidentiary foundation for the documents or a waiver of any party’s objections thereto. 17. No Admissions. Designation by any person or entity of information or documents as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER," or failure to so designate, will not constitute an admission that information or documents are or are not confidential or trade secrets. 18. No Prior Judicial Determination. This Order is based on the representations and agreements of the parties and is entered for the purpose of facilitating discovery in this action.
Nothing in this Order shall be construed or presented as a judicial determination that any Confidential Information is in fact subject to protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or otherwise until such time as the Court may so rule on a specific document or issue. 19. Order Subject To Modification. This Order shall be subject to modification by the Court on its own motion or on motion of a party or any other person with standing concerning the subject matter. 20. Parties May Consent To Disclosure. Nothing shall prevent disclosure beyond the terms of this Order if all affected parties consent to such disclosure, or if the Court, after notice to all effected parties, permits such disclosure. Specifically, if and to the extent any person or entity
wishes to disclose any Confidential Information beyond the terms of this Order, that person or entity shall provide all other parties with reasonable notice in writing of its request to so disclose the materials. If the parties cannot resolve their disagreement with respect to the disclosure of any Confidential Information, then a party may petition the Court for a determination of these issues. In addition, any interested member of the public may also challenge the designation of any material as confidential, pursuant to the terms of this paragraph. 21. Return Of Materials Upon Termination Of Litigation. Upon the written request of the Designating Party, within 30 days after the entry of a final judgment no longer subject to appeal on the merits of this Action, or the execution of any agreement between the parties to resolve amicably and settle this case, the parties and any person authorized by this Protective Order to receive Confidential Information shall return to the Producing Party, or destroy, all Confidential Information designated as Confidential Information by the Producing Party, unless the specific document or information has been offered into evidence or filed without restriction as to disclosure. The person or entity returning or destroying such documents or other information shall certify that it has not maintained any copies of such Confidential Information, except as permitted by this Order. 22. Retention of Archival Copies and Counsel Allowed To Retain Copy Of Filings. Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent outside counsel for a party or third party from maintaining in its files a copy of any filings in the Action, including any such filings that incorporate or attach Confidential Information. Moreover, an attorney may use his or her work product in subsequent litigation provided that such use does not disclose any Confidential Information. Any inaccessible copies of Confidential Information created through the routine operation of the Receiving Party’s standard archival and back up procedures do not need to be returned or destroyed. Any such archival or inaccessible copies, and any Confidential Information retained by an attorney in accordance with this paragraph, shall remain subject to this Protective Order.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: 9/19/2021 Peete Re gether U.S. Magistrate Judge
AGREED TO:
/s/Brian M. Gianangeli /s/Brian D. Wright (per email auth. 3/18/2021) Charles A. Mifsud (0070498) Brian D. Wright (0075359) Brian M. Gianangeli (0072028) Clayton D. Prickett (0100181) The Law Office of Charles Mifsud, LLC Faruki, PLL 6305 Emerald Pkwy. 201 East Fifth St., Suite 1420 Dublin, OH 43016 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Telephone: (614) 389-5282 Telephone: (513) 632-0314 Fax: (614) 389-2294 Fax: (513) 632-0319 bgianangeli@mifsudlaw.com bwright@ficlaw.com cprickett@ficlaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (CINCINNATI)
EXECUTIVE JET MANAGEMENT, INC., : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:21-cv-74 : v. : Judge Susan J. Dlott : LONGBOW ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al., : Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz : Defendants. :
FORM PROTECTIVE ORDER ATTACHMENT A
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that [he/she] has read the Protective Order dated [INSERT DATE OF OPERATIVE PROTECTIVE ORDER] in the above-captioned action and attached hereto, understands the terms thereof, and agrees to be bound by its terms. The undersigned submits to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in matters relating to the Protective Order and understands that the terms of the Protective Order obligate [him/her] to use documents designated “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” in accordance with the Order, solely for the purpose of the above- captioned action, and not to disclose any such documents or information derived directly therefrom to any other person, firm, or concern. The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the Protective Order may result in penalties for contempt of court. Name: Job Title:
Employer: Business Address:
Date: Signature