Executive Jet Management Inc v. Longbow Enterprises, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio
DecidedMarch 19, 2021
Docket1:21-cv-00074
StatusUnknown

This text of Executive Jet Management Inc v. Longbow Enterprises, LLC (Executive Jet Management Inc v. Longbow Enterprises, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Executive Jet Management Inc v. Longbow Enterprises, LLC, (S.D. Ohio 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (CINCINNATI)

EXECUTIVE JET MANAGEMENT, INC., : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:21-cv-74 : v. : Judge Susan J. Dlott : LONGBOW ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al., : Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz : Defendants. :

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ joint request that the Court enter this Order, and their agreement that the following limitations and restrictions should apply to documents and information produced for inspection and copying during the course of this litigation (the “Action”), the Court hereby ORDERS that: 1. Scope. This Protective Order (hereinafter “Protective Order” or “Order”) shall apply to all documents or other information produced in the course of discovery in this Action that have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” pursuant to this Order, including but not limited to, all initial disclosures, all responses to discovery requests, all deposition testimony and exhibits, and all materials (including documents or testimony) produced by non-parties in this Action, including all copies, excerpts, and summaries thereof (collectively the “Confidential Information”). 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Protective Order is to protect against the unnecessary disclosure of Confidential Information and to facilitate discovery by eliminating the need for repeated requests that the Court become directly involved in the discovery process. 3. Disclosure Defined. As used herein, “disclosure” or “to disclose” means to divulge, reveal, describe, summarize, paraphrase, quote, transmit, or otherwise communicate Confidential Information, and the restrictions contained herein regarding disclosure of Confidential Information also apply with equal force to any copies, excerpts, analyses, or

summaries of such materials or the information contained therein, as well as to any pleadings, briefs, exhibits, transcripts or other documents which may be prepared in connection with this Action which contain or refer to the Confidential Information or information contained therein. 4. Designating Material As Confidential. Any party, or any third party subpoenaed by one of the parties or producing information in the course of discovery in this Action (the “Designating Party”), may designate as confidential and subject to this Protective Order any documents, testimony, written responses, or other materials produced in this Action if they contain information that the Designating Party asserts in good faith is protected from disclosure by statute or common law, including, but not limited to, confidential personal information, medical or psychiatric information, trade secrets, personnel records, or such other sensitive commercial

information that is not publicly available. Information that is publicly available may not be designated as confidential. The designation of materials as confidential pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order does not mean that the document or other material has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order. 5. Form and Timing Of Designation. a. Documents And Written Materials. A person or entity producing documents or information in the course of discovery in this Action (a “Producing Party”) shall designate any document or other written materials as confidential pursuant to this Order by marking each page of the material with a stamp identifying it as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” if practical to do so. The Producing Party shall place the stamp, to the extent possible, in such a manner that it will not interfere with the legibility of the document. Materials shall be so-designated prior to, or at the time of, their production or disclosure.

A Designating Party that is not a Producing Party may also designate any document or other written material produced in the course of discovery in this Action as confidential pursuant to this Order. A Designating Party shall do so by designating in a transmittal letter or email to the Producing Party and any other party to whom the materials were produced (a “Receiving Party”) using a reasonable identifier (e.g., the Bates range) any portions of the production that should be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” b. Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”): If a production response includes ESI, the Producing Party shall make an effort to include within the electronic files themselves the designation “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”

to the extent practicable. If that is not practicable, then the Producing Party shall designate in a transmittal letter or email to the Receiving Party(ies) using a reasonable identifier (e.g., the Bates range) any portions of the ESI that should be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” A Designating Party that is not a Producing Party may also designate any production response that includes ESI as confidential pursuant to this Order. A Designating Party shall do so by designating in a transmittal letter or email to the Producing Party and any Receiving Parties using a reasonable identifier (e.g., the Bates range) any portions of the ESI that should be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” c. Deposition Testimony. Deposition testimony will be deemed confidential only if designated as such when the deposition is taken or within five (5) business days after receipt of the deposition transcript. Such designation must be specific as to the

portions of the transcript and/or any exhibits to be protected, except that any exhibit that has previously been marked as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” at the time of production, and which still bears that mark at the time of its use in a deposition, shall be treated as Confidential Information under this Order without further designation. All deposition testimony will be deemed and treated as Confidential Information until five (5) business days after receipt of the deposition transcript, in which case, only those portions designated in accordance with this paragraph 5(c) will be treated as Confidential Information. 6. Limitation Of Use.

a. General Protections. All Confidential Information, including all information derived therefrom, shall be used solely for purposes of prosecuting or defending this Action. Confidential Information shall not be used or disclosed for any other purpose, including but not limited to any business, commercial, or competitive purpose. Except as set forth in this Order, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any third party. This Order shall not prevent the Designating Party from using or disclosing information it has designated as Confidential Information, and that belongs to the Designating Party, for any purpose that the Designating Party deems appropriate, except that the Designating Party’s voluntary disclosure of Confidential Information outside the scope of this Action may impact the protection that this Order would otherwise provide with regard to such information, once disclosed. b. Persons To Whom Confidential Information May Be Disclosed. Use of Confidential Information, including all information derived therefrom, shall be restricted

solely to the following persons who agree to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order, unless additional persons are stipulated by counsel or authorized by the Court: 1. outside counsel of record for the parties, and the administrative staff of outside counsel's firms;

2. in-house counsel for the parties, and the administrative staff for each in- house counsel;

3. any party to this action who is an individual;

4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Executive Jet Management Inc v. Longbow Enterprises, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executive-jet-management-inc-v-longbow-enterprises-llc-ohsd-2021.