Executive Consulting Group v. Ernst & Young, LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Executive Consulting Group v. Ernst & Young, LLP

290 A.D.2d 480, 736 N.Y.S.2d 253, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 593

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 290 A.D.2d 480 (Executive Consulting Group v. Ernst & Young, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Executive Consulting Group v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 290 A.D.2d 480, 736 N.Y.S.2d 253, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract in connection with an employment referral agreement, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated November 16, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found the existence of disputed factual issues sufficient to warrant the denial of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Barrister Referrals v Windels, Marx, Davies & Ives, 169 AD2d 622, 623; Ritta Personnel v Andrew F. Capoccia, P.C., 144 AD2d 196). Florio, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract in connection with an employment referral agreement, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated November 16, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found the existence of disputed factual issues sufficient to warrant the denial of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Barrister Referrals v Windels, Marx, Davies & Ives, 169 AD2d 622, 623; Ritta Personnel v Andrew F. Capoccia, P.C., 144 AD2d 196). Florio, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 480, 736 N.Y.S.2d 253, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executive-consulting-group-v-ernst-young-llp-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack