Executive Communication & Advisory Opinion

25 Fla. 426
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 25 Fla. 426 (Executive Communication & Advisory Opinion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Executive Communication & Advisory Opinion, 25 Fla. 426 (Fla. 1889).

Opinion

Supreme Court of the State of Florida, ) Tallahassee, Fla., Jan. 16, 1889. )

To ITon. Francis P. Fleming, Governor of the State of Florida :

Sir : We have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your communication of the 12th inst. You state that certain persons who were elected to county offices at the general election, held on the 6th day of November last, have failed to give bond and qualify within sixty days after such [428]*428election, and thereby such offices have become vacant, and you ask our interpretation of the Constitution as to the power ot the Governor to fill by appointment such or other vacancies that may occur in elective county offices, and if so, for what time the appointment should be made.

Considering Section 6 of Article VIII, and Sections 9 and 10 of Article XVIII, together, it is plain that the first election of the following county offices, viz : Clerk of the Circuit Court, Sheriff, Constables, County Assessor of Taxes, Tax Collector, County Treasurer, Superintendent of Public Instruction, and County Surveyor and Justices of the Peace, and all elective county offices, was to take place on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, A. D. 1888. By Section 14 of Article XVIII it is provided that “the terms of office of all county officers, unless otherwise provided, shall commence on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January next after their election.”

The elective county officers, chosen at the election in November last, have not been excepted from the provisions of the last section as to the commencement of the terms for which they were elected.

Section 7 of Article VIII of the Constitution requires that all county officers, except Assistant Assessors of Taxes, shall, before entering upon the duties of their respective offices, be commissioned by the Governor, but provides that no such commission shall issue to any such officer until he shall have filed with the Secretary of State a good and sufficient bond, in such sum and upon such conditions as the Legislature shall by law prescribe, approved by the County Commissioners of the county in which such officer resides, and by the Comptroller. The last Legislature passed an act, chapter 3724, Laws of 1887, approved June 2, 1887, prescribing the sums and conditions of the bonds [429]*429to be given by such officers. The above section of the Constitution also provides as follows : “ If any person elected or appointed to any county office shall fail to give bond and qualify within sixty days after his election, the said office shall become vacant.”

The question of your power to fill vacancies occasioned by the failure of persons elected to county offices to give bond and qualify within the sixty days just mentioned, involves a consideration of several sections of the Constitution. Sections 6, 7 and 9 of the schedule, or eighteenth article, are as follows :

Section 6. The term of office for all appointees to fill vacancies in any of the elective offices under this Constitution shall extend only to the election and qualification of a successor at the ensuing general election.

Section 7. In all cases of elections to fill vacancies in office such election shall be for the unexpired term.

Section 9. A general election shall be held in each county in this State on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, A. I). 1888, and every two years thereafter, for all elective State and county officers, whose terms of office are about to expire, or for any office that shall have become vacant.

These three sections cover vacancies in elective county offices, and a vacancy of the character specified by you must, in view of Section 7 of Article VIII, supra, be held to be within their meaning. Considering sections 6 and 7 of the schedule together, we see that the former contemplates the filling of a vacancy7 by appointment and the latter by an election. Though the word appointees may sometimes include in its signification any person elected or designated by popular vote for an office, such construction of it in the connection in which it is presented here is, we think, untenable. If such had been the sense in or purpose for [430]*430which it was used, there would have been no necessity for the next or seventh section. Again, the latter section shows an express intention that any person elected to fill a vacancy shall hold for the balance of the unexpired term, whereas the former section is equally explicit in providing that one appointed to the vacancy shall hold only to the qualification of the person chosen at the ensuing general election to fill the remainder of such vacancy. If we should give to the word appointees, as used in the sixth section, a signification inclnding persons chosen at a popular election, we would be met with the anomaly that by this section of the Constitution it is provided that a person elected to a vacancy in an elective office shall hold for one period of time, whereas by the seventh section he is to hold for an entirely different period.

Our understanding of these two sections, as applicable to elective county offices, is that when a vacancy occurs in any of them, an appointment to fill such vacancy may be made by the Governor, and that such appointee holds until the qualification of the person who may be chosen at the ensuing general election to fill the residue of the term, after such election.

That this is the correct interpretation is made more apparent by the ninth section, in providing that a general election shall be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, and every two years thereafter, for, among other purposes, “any office that shall have become vacant.” This is the “general election ” which is referred to in the sixth section, and at which the person is to be elected whose “ qualification ” terminates the tenure of the appointee holding under the sixth section. The seventh section prescribes the term of the person chosen at an election held under the ninth section to fill a vacancy in an elective county office.

[431]*431It is clear, we think, that these sections contemplate that upon a vacancy occurring in an elective county office the vacanc}'- may be filled by appointment, and that such an appointment, when made, shall continue not merely until the election of a successor at a special election, and his qualification, but until the qualification of a successor, chosen at the ensuing general election, to be held as provided by section nine.

In reaching the conclusion announced above we have not overlooked section 7, of the executive article, which is as follows:

When any office from any cause shall become vacant and no mode is provided by this Constitution, or by the laws of the State for filling such vacancy, the Governor shall have power to fill such vacancy by granting a commission for the unexpired term.

Under this section no appointment is to be made to fill a vacanc}? except when neither the Constitution nor the laws providea modefor filling it,and of course where the appointment is not made under it, its provisions as to the duration of fhe appointment do not apply. Section 7 of the executive article of the Constitution of 1868 was in substantially the same language, except that the commission was “ to expire at the next

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sphinx International, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance
226 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (M.D. Florida, 2002)
Gray v. Bryant
125 So. 2d 846 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)
State Ex Rel. Stain v. Christensen
35 P.2d 775 (Utah Supreme Court, 1934)
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Giblin
124 So. 375 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
State Ex Rel. Wallace v. Callow
254 P. 187 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor
111 So. 252 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Rodwell v. . Rowland
50 S.E. 319 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Fla. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executive-communication-advisory-opinion-fla-1889.