Executive Benefits v. Arkison

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 25, 2011
Docket11-35162
StatusPublished

This text of Executive Benefits v. Arkison (Executive Benefits v. Arkison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Executive Benefits v. Arkison, (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the Matter of: BELLINGHAM  INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., Debtor,

No. 11-35162 EXECUTIVE BENEFITS INSURANCE D.C. No. AGENCY, 2:10-cv-00929-MJP Appellant,  Western District of v. Washington, PETER H. ARKISON, TRUSTEE, solely Seattle in his capacity as Chapter 7 ORDER Trustee of the estate of Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc., Appellee.  Filed November 25, 2011

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judge, and Raner C. Collins, District Judge.*

ORDER

The United States’s motion for a 45-day extension of time to respond to this court’s November 4, 2011 order is GRANTED. Any amicus brief or motion to intervene by the United States must be filed on or before January 19, 2012. The time for other amici to respond to this court’s November 4 order is similarly extended.

*The Honorable Raner C. Collins, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Arizona, sitting by designation.

20611 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2011 Thomson Reuters.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Executive Benefits v. Arkison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executive-benefits-v-arkison-ca9-2011.