Executive Benefits v. Arkison
This text of Executive Benefits v. Arkison (Executive Benefits v. Arkison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In the Matter of: BELLINGHAM INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., Debtor,
No. 11-35162 EXECUTIVE BENEFITS INSURANCE D.C. No. AGENCY, 2:10-cv-00929-MJP Appellant, Western District of v. Washington, PETER H. ARKISON, TRUSTEE, solely Seattle in his capacity as Chapter 7 ORDER Trustee of the estate of Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc., Appellee. Filed November 25, 2011
Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judge, and Raner C. Collins, District Judge.*
ORDER
The United States’s motion for a 45-day extension of time to respond to this court’s November 4, 2011 order is GRANTED. Any amicus brief or motion to intervene by the United States must be filed on or before January 19, 2012. The time for other amici to respond to this court’s November 4 order is similarly extended.
*The Honorable Raner C. Collins, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Arizona, sitting by designation.
20611 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2011 Thomson Reuters.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Executive Benefits v. Arkison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/executive-benefits-v-arkison-ca9-2011.