Executive Benefits v Arkison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 25, 2011·No. 11-35162·Published

Opinion

FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the Matter of: BELLINGHAM No. 11-35162 INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00929-MJP Debtor, Western District of Washington, Seattle

EXECUTIVE BENEFITS INSURANCE AGENCY, ORDER

Appellant,

v.

PETER H. ARKISON, TRUSTEE, solely in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.,

Appellee.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, PAEZ, Circuit Judge, and COLLINS, District Judge.*

The United States’s motion for a 45-day extension of time to respond to this

court’s November 4, 2011 order is GRANTED. Any amicus brief or motion to

* The Honorable Raner C. Collins, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Arizona, sitting by designation. intervene by the United States must be filed on or before January 19, 2012. The

time for other amici to respond to this court’s November 4 order is similarly

extended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Executive Benefits v Arkison, (9th Cir. 2011).

Executive Benefits v Arkison (Executive Benefits v Arkison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.