Exec, Inc. v. Brevard County Sheriff's Office

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Exec, Inc. v. Brevard County Sheriff's Office

821 So. 2d 1231, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10431, 2002 WL 1724009

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 26, 2002

DocketNo. 5D02-1977

StatusPublished

This text of 821 So. 2d 1231 (Exec, Inc. v. Brevard County Sheriff's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Exec, Inc. v. Brevard County Sheriff's Office, 821 So. 2d 1231, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10431, 2002 WL 1724009 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner filed a motion to disqualify pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160. The motion meets the requirements of the rule. See Duest v. Goldstein, 654 So.2d 1004, 1004 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (trial judge, a former assistant state attorney, assisted state attorney who prosecuted petitioner in his original trial; further, at the time of petitioner’s conviction, trial judge was the supervising state attorney of the division in which petitioner was tried); see also Goines v. State, 708 So.2d 656, 658-59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (mere fact that trial judge had once been employed by the state attorney would not in itself have required disqualification, but disqualification is required if judge had any prior involvement with the pending criminal charges). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition. Because we are confident that the trial judge will promptly comply with this court’s opinion, we withhold formal issuance of the writ.

PETITION GRANTED.

THOMPSON, C.J., GRIFFIN, and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner filed a motion to disqualify pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160. The motion meets the requirements of the rule. See Duest v. Goldstein, 654 So.2d 1004, 1004 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (trial judge, a former assistant state attorney, assisted state attorney who prosecuted petitioner in his original trial; further, at the time of petitioner’s conviction, trial judge was the supervising state attorney of the division in which petitioner was tried); see also Goines v. State, 708 So.2d 656, 658-59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (mere fact that trial judge had once been employed by the state attorney would not in itself have required disqualification, but disqualification is required if judge had any prior involvement with the pending criminal charges). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition. Because we are confident that the trial judge will promptly comply with this court’s opinion, we withhold formal issuance of the writ.

PETITION GRANTED.

THOMPSON, C.J., GRIFFIN, and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

821 So. 2d 1231, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10431, 2002 WL 1724009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/exec-inc-v-brevard-county-sheriffs-office-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack