Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 2012·No. 05-12-01192-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS; Opinion flIed October 29, 2012

In The Iturt tif \ppcaIs FiftI! OtEtrtct uf xa at at1a No. 05-12-01192-CV

EXCO OPERATING COMPANY, LP AND BG US PRODUCTION COMPANY, LLC, Appellants

V.

TAUREN EXPLORATION, INC. AND CUBIC ENERGY, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court I)allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-l1-12425

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Richter, and Lang Opinion By Justice Bridges

Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants inform

the Court that the parties have settled their differences. Accordingly. we GRANT appellants’

motion and I)ISMISS the appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

I DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

121 192F.P05 (Lunri uf Appcahi FiftI! iitrirt nf rxa at Ji11wi JUDGMENT EXC() OPERATING COMPANY. LP AND Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court BG US PRODUCTION COMPANY. LLC, of Dallas County. Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DC-l 1- Appellants 12425). Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices NC). 05-12-01 192-CV V. Richter and Lang. participating.

lAUREN EXPL(.)RATION. INC. AND CUBIC ENERGY. INC., Appellees

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered October 29, 2012.

DAVIDL. BRIDGES JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc (Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.