Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc
Opinion
DISMISS; Opinion flIed October 29, 2012
In The Iturt tif \ppcaIs FiftI! OtEtrtct uf xa at at1a No. 05-12-01192-CV
EXCO OPERATING COMPANY, LP AND BG US PRODUCTION COMPANY, LLC, Appellants
V.
TAUREN EXPLORATION, INC. AND CUBIC ENERGY, INC., Appellees
On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court I)allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-l1-12425
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Richter, and Lang Opinion By Justice Bridges
Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants inform
the Court that the parties have settled their differences. Accordingly. we GRANT appellants’
motion and I)ISMISS the appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).
I DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
121 192F.P05 (Lunri uf Appcahi FiftI! iitrirt nf rxa at Ji11wi JUDGMENT EXC() OPERATING COMPANY. LP AND Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court BG US PRODUCTION COMPANY. LLC, of Dallas County. Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DC-l 1- Appellants 12425). Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices NC). 05-12-01 192-CV V. Richter and Lang. participating.
lAUREN EXPL(.)RATION. INC. AND CUBIC ENERGY. INC., Appellees
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.
Judgment entered October 29, 2012.
DAVIDL. BRIDGES JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc (Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.