Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry.

1932 OK 74, 7 P.2d 902, 155 Okla. 34, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 69
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 2, 1932·No. 22245·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ANDREWS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review in favor of the protestant, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and against the excise board of Kay county, Okla., involving appropriations and levies made by the excise board of Kay county for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1931.

*35 The parties hereto have stipulated and ■agreed that the decision of this court in cause No. 22128, Caddo County, Oklahoma, Company (this day rendered)' T55 Okla. 82, 7 P. (2d) 800, shall be controlling herein. Pursuant to that stipulation, the law as announced in that case is applied and, pursuant thereto, the judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, Y. C. .7., and RILEY, HBENER, OüLLISON, SWIN-DALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JL, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry., 1932 OK 74, 7 P.2d 902, 155 Okla. 34, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 69 (Okla. 1932).

1932 OK 74 (Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Walker
1958 OK 297 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1958)
Haas v. Holloman
1958 OK 174 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1958)
Thompson v. Stanley
1938 OK 488 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Shaw v. Fox
55 S.W.2d 11 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)