Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry.

1932 OK 74, 7 P.2d 902, 155 Okla. 34, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 69

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 2, 1932

Docket22245

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1932 OK 74 (Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry., 1932 OK 74, 7 P.2d 902, 155 Okla. 34, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 69 (Okla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

ANDREWS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review in favor of the protestant, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and against the excise board of Kay county, Okla., involving appropriations and levies made by the excise board of Kay county for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1931.

*35 The parties hereto have stipulated and ■agreed that the decision of this court in cause No. 22128, Caddo County, Oklahoma, Company (this day rendered)' T55 Okla. 82, 7 P. (2d) 800, shall be controlling herein. Pursuant to that stipulation, the law as announced in that case is applied and, pursuant thereto, the judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, Y. C. .7., and RILEY, HBENER, OüLLISON, SWIN-DALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JL, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANDREWS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review in favor of the protestant, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and against the excise board of Kay county, Okla., involving appropriations and levies made by the excise board of Kay county for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1931.

*35 The parties hereto have stipulated and ■agreed that the decision of this court in cause No. 22128, Caddo County, Oklahoma, Company (this day rendered)' T55 Okla. 82, 7 P. (2d) 800, shall be controlling herein. Pursuant to that stipulation, the law as announced in that case is applied and, pursuant thereto, the judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, Y. C. .7., and RILEY, HBENER, OüLLISON, SWIN-DALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JL, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1932 OK 74, 7 P.2d 902, 155 Okla. 34, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/excise-board-of-kay-county-v-chicago-ri-p-ry-okla-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack