Exchange Drug Co. v. Long

Supreme Court

Exchange Drug Co. v. Long

281 U.S. 693, 50 S. Ct. 244

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 12, 1930·No. No. 309·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. [694] King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Mr. Robert Benson Evins for appellant. Messrs. Charlie C. McCall, Attorney General of Alabama, Richard T. Rives, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence H. Lee on the- brief for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. [694] King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Mr. Robert Benson Evins for appellant. Messrs. Charlie C. McCall, Attorney General of Alabama, Richard T. Rives, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence H. Lee on the- brief for appellees.

Exchange Drug Co. v. Long, 281 U.S. 693, 50 S. Ct. 244 (1930).

Pincite

281 U.S. 693 (Exchange Drug Co. v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related