Exchange Bank of Oakefield v. Cone
89 S.E. 489, 18 Ga. App. 432, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 393
Opinion
This court will not interfere with the judgment of a trial court granting a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, unless it is made to appear that the trial judge abused his discretion. . Judgment,affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Exchange Bank of Oakefield v. Cone, 89 S.E. 489, 18 Ga. App. 432, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
89 S.E. 489 (Exchange Bank of Oakefield v. Cone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wesleyan College v. Weber
517 S.E.2d 813 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Tyre v. State
143 S.E. 778 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Evans v. Grier
115 S.E. 921 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)