ExcelUSMLE Review LLC v. Reddy

2026 NY Slip Op 30716(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedMarch 2, 2026
DocketIndex No. 654449/2025
StatusUnpublished
AuthorAndrew Borrok

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 30716(U) (ExcelUSMLE Review LLC v. Reddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ExcelUSMLE Review LLC v. Reddy, 2026 NY Slip Op 30716(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

ExcelUSMLE Review LLC v Reddy 2026 NY Slip Op 30716(U) March 2, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654449/2025 Judge: Andrew Borrok Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.6544492025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/10/2026 3:45:54 PM] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/2026 02:31 PM INDEX NO. 654449/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/02/2026

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION PART 53 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X EXCELUSMLE REVIEW LLC,ALI FAROOQI INDEX NO. 654449/2025

Plaintiff, MOTION DATE 09/04/2025 -v- MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 SHRAVAN REDDY, APLIHSMD LLC,

Defendant. DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

HON. ANDREW BORROK:

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 62, 63 were read on this motion to/for PREL INJUNCTION/TEMP REST ORDR .

Upon the foregoing documents and for the reasons set forth on record (tr. 3.2.26), the Plaintiffs’

motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED as unopposed.

THE RELEVANT FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES

The Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction to enforce certain confidentiality, non-compete, and

non-solicitation restrictive covenants that are part of the Operating Agreement (hereinafter

defined) of ExcelUSMLE Review, LLC (Excel) against the Defendants.

Reference is made to a certain Limited Liability Operating Agreement (the Operating

Agreement; NYSCEF Doc. No. 13) dated as of June 1, 2024 by and between Ali Farooqi and

Shravan Reddy. Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, the parties agreed to restrict Dr. Reddy’s

use of confidential information obtained while a member of Excel:

24. Confidentiality. 654449/2025 EXCELUSMLE REVIEW LLC ET AL vs. REDDY, SHRAVAN ET AL Page 1 of 8 Motion No. 001

1 of 8 [* 1] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/2026 02:31 PM INDEX NO. 654449/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/02/2026

While a Member of the Company, and for a period of three years after a Members interest in the company is terminated by a Withdrawal Event, or the dissolution of the Company, as described above, the Member shall hold and maintain in the strictest confidence and shall not, either directly or indirectly, through any manner or by any means of communication whatsoever, communicate, disclose, use or transfer, or permit the communication, transfer, use or disclosure, of any trade secrets, proprietary information or any other Confidential Information of the Company (as defined below), to any person or entity. Further, Member shall not misappropriate and shall not otherwise use, communicate, disclose, transfer, or permit the use, communication, transfer, or disclosure of any Confidential Information for the Member’s own personal benefit, gain, or advantage, or for the benefit, gain or advantage of any other person or entity except for the benefit of the Company, including but not limited to, any person or entity by whom/which Member is subsequently employed as an employee, contractor, consultant, or in any other capacity.

Members agreed that they will possess and use Confidential Information only during the term of their membership in the Company and only in the Company’s interests.

Confidential Information includes: (1) any and all business methods, plans and practices, documents and materials, trade secrets, technical data, know-how and all proprietary information; (2) all information relating to past, current, or potential customers, clients, medical students, applicants for residency or fellowships and other students, hospitals, agencies or medical schools arranging rotation and any other customers/clients of the Company (collectively, the “Clients”), including all non-public information about all aspects of their businesses, student lists, work in progress information, research, services, and any other student, hospital, agency or medical school information); and all information on Client leads/referrals and all sources for Client leads/referrals; (3) all information about market information, marketing, advertising, and business relations, (including all plans, strategies, and methodologies), and all plans, methods, and strategies for determining target markets/Clients, and for implementing such targeted marketing/advertising campaigns; (4) all other information not mentioned above concerning the Company’s business affairs, including, without limitation, all financial information and statements, financial projections and budgets, historical and projected sales data, capital spending budgets and plans, compensation (including any commission scale information) and the names and backgrounds of key personnel and contractors, student and/or personnel training techniques, teaching and other materials, software, development, technology, and hardware configuration information; and (5) any other proprietary or confidential information, as described herein, of any third party which may disclose such information to the Company, or of which the Company may become aware, in the course of such third party’s business dealings or relationships with the Company. 654449/2025 EXCELUSMLE REVIEW LLC ET AL vs. REDDY, SHRAVAN ET AL Page 2 of 8 Motion No. 001

2 of 8 [* 2] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/2026 02:31 PM INDEX NO. 654449/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/02/2026

“Confidential Information” does not include information that: (a) was already known to the applicable Member free of any confidentiality restrictions at the time it was learned by such Member; (b) is subsequently learned from an independent third party free of any confidentiality restrictions and without breach of this Agreement or any agreement with such independent third party; (c) is or becomes publicly available through no direct or indirect breach or fault of the applicable Member.

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 13 § 24). They also agreed that Dr. Reddy could not compete with Excel, or

solicit its employees or other contractors, while he was a member of Excel and for three years

thereafter:

25. Noncompete.

(a) While a Member of the Company, and for a period of three years (36 months) after a Members interest in the company is terminated by a Withdrawal Event, or the dissolution of the Company, as described above, without the prior written consent of each of the other Members, the affected Member shall not:

(i)(A) employ, assist in employing, or otherwise associate in business with any present or former employee, consultant or contractor, member, manager, officer or agent of the Company, (B) induce any person who is an employee, consultant, contractor, member, manager, officer or agent of the Company to terminate said relationship (C) serve as a partner, employee, consultant, officer, director, manager, agent, associate, investor or otherwise (in any form or capacity) for, or (D) directly or indirectly, own, purchase, organize or take preparatory steps for the organization of, or € build, design, finance, acquire, lease, operate, manage, invest in, work or consult for or otherwise become affiliated with, in each case, any business in competition with or otherwise similar to the Company’s business within the United States (the “Territory”); or

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Badman v. Falk
150 N.E.2d 240 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 30716(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/excelusmle-review-llc-v-reddy-nysupctnewyork-2026.