Excell Armstead v. Anton Kohlrus
This text of 333 F.2d 842 (Excell Armstead v. Anton Kohlrus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
333 F.2d 842
Excell ARMSTEAD, Appellant,
v.
Anton KOHLRUS et al., Appellees.
No. 15782.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
June 24, 1964.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern District, at Detroit; Thaddeus M. Machrowicz, Judge.
Excell Armstead, in pro. per.
Samuel J. Torina, Detroit, Mich., for Honorable George E. Bowles, John J. Rusinack and Carl Ziemba.
Thomas Roy Finn, River Rouge, Mich., for George Mihaiu, Arthur Young and Victor Gori.
Thomas I. Klein, Detroit, Mich., Levin, Levin, Garvett & Dill, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for Anton Kohlrus.
Before MILLER and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.
ORDER.
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and arguments of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof,
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 F.2d 842, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/excell-armstead-v-anton-kohlrus-ca6-1964.