Home/Supreme Court/Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.

Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.

528 U.S. 946, 120 S. Ct. 368, 145 L. Ed. 2d 284, 68 U.S.L.W. 3249, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10619, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6588
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1999
DocketNo. 99-95
StatusPublished

This text of 528 U.S. 946 (Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp., 528 U.S. 946, 120 S. Ct. 368, 145 L. Ed. 2d 284, 68 U.S.L.W. 3249, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10619, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6588 (1999).

Opinion

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Statement of Justice Stevens respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.

The importance of the question presented in this certiorari petition makes it appropriate to reiterate the fact that the denial of [947]*947the petition does not constitute a ruling on the merits. See Carpenter v. Gomez, 516 U. S. 981 (1995) (opinion of Stevens, J., respecting denial of certiorari); Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc., 338 U. S. 912, 917-919 (1950) (opinion of Frankfurter, J., respecting denial of certiorari).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.
338 U.S. 912 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Carpenter v. Gomez
516 U.S. 981 (Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 U.S. 946, 120 S. Ct. 368, 145 L. Ed. 2d 284, 68 U.S.L.W. 3249, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10619, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/excel-communications-inc-v-att-corp-scotus-1999.