Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.
528 U.S. 946, 120 S. Ct. 368, 145 L. Ed. 2d 284, 68 U.S.L.W. 3249, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10619, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6588
Opinion
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Statement of Justice Stevens respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.
The importance of the question presented in this certiorari petition makes it appropriate to reiterate the fact that the denial of [947]*947the petition does not constitute a ruling on the merits. See Carpenter v. Gomez, 516 U. S. 981 (1995) (opinion of Stevens, J., respecting denial of certiorari); Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc., 338 U. S. 912, 917-919 (1950) (opinion of Frankfurter, J., respecting denial of certiorari).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp., 528 U.S. 946, 120 S. Ct. 368, 145 L. Ed. 2d 284, 68 U.S.L.W. 3249, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10619, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6588 (1999).
528 U.S. 946 (Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.
338 U.S. 912 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Carpenter v. Gomez
516 U.S. 981 (Supreme Court, 1995)