Excel Baronne Discount, Inc. v. Montana

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Excel Baronne Discount, Inc. v. Montana

279 So. 2d 229, 1973 La. App. LEXIS 6124

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 5, 1973

DocketNo. 5544

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 So. 2d 229 (Excel Baronne Discount, Inc. v. Montana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Excel Baronne Discount, Inc. v. Montana, 279 So. 2d 229, 1973 La. App. LEXIS 6124 (La. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

REDMANN, Judge.

An employer garnished under fi. fa. appeals from a judgment condemning it for payments under R.S. 13:3881(1) as worded when garnishment occurred, rather than after amendment by La.Acts 1970, No. 242.

Pending this appeal, Hooter v. Wilson, La., 273 So.2d 516 (1972), held the amendment applicable to existing garnishments.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and the judgment creditor’s rule is dismissed at its cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

REDMANN, Judge.

An employer garnished under fi. fa. appeals from a judgment condemning it for payments under R.S. 13:3881(1) as worded when garnishment occurred, rather than after amendment by La.Acts 1970, No. 242.

Pending this appeal, Hooter v. Wilson, La., 273 So.2d 516 (1972), held the amendment applicable to existing garnishments.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and the judgment creditor’s rule is dismissed at its cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 So. 2d 229, 1973 La. App. LEXIS 6124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/excel-baronne-discount-inc-v-montana-lactapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack