Exaus v. Daniels

929 So. 2d 38, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5670, 2006 WL 1006524
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-1889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 929 So. 2d 38 (Exaus v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Exaus v. Daniels, 929 So. 2d 38, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5670, 2006 WL 1006524 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Dep’t of Revenue v. Harris, 684 So.2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peterson v. Peterson
929 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 So. 2d 38, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5670, 2006 WL 1006524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/exaus-v-daniels-fladistctapp-2006.