ExamWorks, LLC v. Baldini

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 11, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00920·Unknown

Opinion

1 ROBERT S. SHWARTS (STATE BAR NO. 196803) rshwarts@orrick.com 2 CATHERINE Y. LUI (STATE BAR NO. 239648) clui@orrick.com 3 NATHAN SHAFFER (STATE BAR NO. 282015) nshaffer@orrick.com 4 JOHANNA L. JACOB (STATE BAR NO. 286796) jjacob@orrick.com 5 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 6 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 7 Telephone: +1 415 773 5700 Facsimile: +1 415 773 5759 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 ExamWorks, LLC

10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 EXAMWORKS, a Delaware limited liability No. 2:20-cv-00920-KJM-DB company, 15 STIPULATED NON-TRIAL Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 v. 17

TODD BALDINI, an individual, ABYGAIL 18 BIRD, an individual, LAWRENCE STUART GIRARD, an individual, PAMELLA TEJADA, 19 an individual, ROE CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 10, 20 Defendants. 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1. PURPOSES & LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 3 confidential, proprietary, or private information, including without limitation confidential 4 business information, financial information, competitive strategies and marketing information, 5 and other competitive and non-public information for which special protection from public 6 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted 7 due to the risks that public disclosure could, if disclosed, cause competitive harm. Accordingly, 8 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 9 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 10 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 11 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 12 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in section 12.3, 13 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 14 under seal; Local Rule 141 and the Standing Order of the judge who will decide the matter related 15 to a request to seal set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be 16 applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 17 2. DEFINITIONS 18 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 19 information or items under this Order. 20 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 21 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 22 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 23 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 24 well as their support staff). 25 2.4 Designated House Counsel: House Counsel who seek access to “HIGHLY 26 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information in this matter. 27 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that 28 are produced in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 1 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Nothing in this order precludes a party from 2 designating material produced by another party or a third party provided that they have a 3 sufficient basis to do so. 4 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 5 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 6 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 7 responses to discovery in this matter. 8 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 9 the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or 10 as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s 11 competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party 12 or of a Party’s competitor. 13 2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or 14 Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another 15 Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by 16 less restrictive means. 17 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action; and whose 18 duties and responsibilities with a party primarily concern the providing of legal advice and 19 counsel, or otherwise concerning representing the party in a legal capacity. House Counsel does 20 not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 21 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 22 entity not named as a Party to this action. 23 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 24 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action 25 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 26 2.12 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 27 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 28 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 1 Material in this action. 2 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities who are not: (i) employees of, a direct or 3 indirect owner of, owner directly or indirectly by, or otherwise affiliated with, a party to this 4 action, or (ii) whom otherwise do not have a pecuniary interest in the outcome in the above- 5 captioned action; and that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, 6 translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any 7 form or medium), and their employees and subcontractors. 8 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 9 “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 10 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 11 Producing Party. 12 3. SCOPE 13 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 14 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 15 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 16 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 17 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 18 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 19 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 20 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 21 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information (i) known to the Receiving Party 22 and obtained outside of an employment relationship with the disclosing party and through lawful 23 means with no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party prior to the disclosure or (ii) 24 obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information 25 lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Nothing in this 26 Protective Order shall prohibit ExamWorks from reviewing or accessing any documents produced 27 by Defendants that is ExamWorks’ documents or information or contains or derived from 28 ExamWorks’ documents or information. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed 1 by a separate agreement or order. 2 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ExamWorks, LLC v. Baldini, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

ExamWorks, LLC v. Baldini (ExamWorks, LLC v. Baldini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)