Ex Rel. Figlos v. Cole, District Judge
1910 OK CR 139, 109 P. 744, 4 Okla. Crim. 45, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 24
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 26, 1910·No. No. A-751.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The facts and issues in this case are the same as in the case of Ex rel. Eubanks v. Cole, District Judge, infra, 109 Pac. 736, and presents the same questions.
For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the writ of mandamus will be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Rel. Figlos v. Cole, District Judge, 1910 OK CR 139, 109 P. 744, 4 Okla. Crim. 45, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 24 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).
1910 OK CR 139 (Ex Rel. Figlos v. Cole, District Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nickell v. State
1925 OK CR 222 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1925)