Ex Rel. Figlos v. Cole, District Judge
1910 OK CR 139, 109 P. 744, 4 Okla. Crim. 45, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 24
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 26, 1910
DocketNo. A-751.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 1910 OK CR 139 (Ex Rel. Figlos v. Cole, District Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ex Rel. Figlos v. Cole, District Judge, 1910 OK CR 139, 109 P. 744, 4 Okla. Crim. 45, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 24 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).
Opinion
The facts and issues in this case are the same as in the case of Ex rel. Eubanks v. Cole, District Judge, infra, 109 Pac. 736, and presents the same questions.
For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the writ of mandamus will be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nickell v. State
1925 OK CR 222 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1910 OK CR 139, 109 P. 744, 4 Okla. Crim. 45, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-rel-figlos-v-cole-district-judge-oklacrimapp-1910.