Ex Parte Young

397 S.W.2d 74, 1965 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1194
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 10, 1965·No. 38646·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding remanding appellant to custody for extradition to the State of California to answer a charge “by complaint and supporting papers” of the crime of “Grand Theft and violation of Section 10851 of the California Vehicle Code.”

The Executive Warrant issued by the Governor of Texas and the supporting papers were offered in evidence and appellant admitted his identity as the person named therein.

Reversal is sought upon the ground that the California offenses are felonies and no proof was offered that prosecution there *75 on could be had in that state upon complaint.

A similar contention was overruled by this Court in the recent case of Ex parte Stanley, Tex.Cr.App., 377 S.W.2d 650. See also Ex parte Powers, Tex.Cr.App., 391 S.W.2d 413; Ex parte Powers, Tex.Cr.App., 391 S.W.2d 414.

The judgment remanding appellant to custody for extradition under the Executive Warrant is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Young, 397 S.W.2d 74, 1965 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1194 (Tex. 1965).

397 S.W.2d 74 (Ex Parte Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Baker
465 S.W.2d 379 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Ex Parte Blazier
435 S.W.2d 506 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Ex Parte Preston
434 S.W.2d 136 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Ex parte Ham
423 S.W.2d 598 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Ex Parte Krarup
422 S.W.2d 173 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Ex Parte Favor
406 S.W.2d 434 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Sellars v. State
400 S.W.2d 559 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)