Ex parte Wyatt

190 So. 2d 924, 43 Ala. App. 379, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 531
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 27, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 So. 2d 924 (Ex parte Wyatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Wyatt, 190 So. 2d 924, 43 Ala. App. 379, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 531 (Ala. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

This is a petition in an original action for mandamus filed July 13, 1966.

The prayer is for a free transcript of a 1964 conviction in the Jefferson Circuit Court. Wyatt claims he needs the transcript so that he “might draw a manifest of allegations that would show * * * errors * * * that will demand petitioner’s release through coram nobis.”

[380]*380I.

The first ground on which we decide the petition is expressed fully in Ex parte Goodman, ante p. 183, 185 So.2d 146.

Here Wyatt has given us no inkling of the offense for which he is being punishéd beyond the fact that he is in the trusty barracks at Kilby Prison. This standing alone shows he is in the penitentiary which is the effect of a felony conviction.

II.

Also, as to the merits, we consider that ordinarily discovery before filing a petition for coram nobis is premature and hence the request is coram non judice.

Therefore, the petition is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunt v. State
480 So. 2d 61 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 So. 2d 924, 43 Ala. App. 379, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-wyatt-alactapp-1966.