Ex parte Wright
6 Cow. 399
This text of 6 Cow. 399 (Ex parte Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ex parte Wright, 6 Cow. 399 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1826).
Opinion
The court below were right. A general submission to arbitration is a discontinuance. Not so of a submission, where a judgment on the report, or a cognovit, is to follow. By the very terms of the submission, the cause is to be continued in court. The motion must be denied.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People ex rel. Martin, Bing & Co. v. County of Westchester
53 A.D. 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Callanan v. Port Huron & Northwestern Railway Co.
27 N.W. 718 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)
McNulty v. . Solley
95 N.Y. 242 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Hearne v. Brown
67 Me. 156 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1877)
Hills v. Passage
21 Wis. 294 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1867)
Merritt v. . Thompson
27 N.Y. 225 (New York Court of Appeals, 1863)
Buel v. Dewey
22 How. Pr. 342 (New York Supreme Court, 1862)
Mooers v. Allen
35 Me. 276 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1853)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Cow. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-wright-nysupct-1826.