Ex parte Wright

119 Cal. 401
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 21, 1897
DocketCrim. No. 377
StatusPublished

This text of 119 Cal. 401 (Ex parte Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Wright, 119 Cal. 401 (Cal. 1897).

Opinion

BEATTY, C. J.

Application for the writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that the justice of the peace, in whose court the [402]*402prisoner was convicted (by a jury) of a misdemeanor, was ousted of jurisdiction by the filing of an affidavit by defendant that he had reason to believe, and did believe, that he could not have a fair and impartial trial before said justice by reason of his prejudice and bias. (Pen. Code, sec. 1431, subd. 1.)

The refusal of the justice to change the pilace of trial may have been an error, and if so the prisoner has an ample remedy by appeal, but the justice did not exceed his jurisdiction in proceeding with the trial after overruling the motion for change of venue. (Lowery v. Hogue, 85 Cal. 600.) His judgment, therefore, is not void, and habeas corpus does not lie.

Writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowrey v. Hogue
24 P. 995 (California Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 Cal. 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-wright-cal-1897.