Ex parte Wright

51 P. 639, 119 Cal. 401, 1897 Cal. LEXIS 909
California Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1897·No. Crim. No. 377·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

BEATTY, C. J.

Application for the writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that the justice of the peace, in whose court the [402] prisoner was convicted (by a jury) of a misdemeanor, was ousted of jurisdiction by the filing of an affidavit by defendant that he had reason to believe, and did believe, that he could not have a fair and impartial trial before said justice by reason of his prejudice and bias. (Pen. Code, sec. 1431, subd. 1.)

The refusal of the justice to change the pilace of trial may have been an error, and if so the prisoner has an ample remedy by appeal, but the justice did not exceed his jurisdiction in proceeding with the trial after overruling the motion for change of venue. (Lowery v. Hogue, 85 Cal. 600.) His judgment, therefore, is not void, and habeas corpus does not lie.

Writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Wright, 51 P. 639, 119 Cal. 401, 1897 Cal. LEXIS 909 (Cal. 1897).

51 P. 639 (Ex parte Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Casas
48 P.2d 990 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
People v. Radich
111 Cal. App. 779 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1930)
State ex rel. Wilberg v. McNaughton
199 N.W. 103 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1924)
State v. Morgan
140 P. 218 (Utah Supreme Court, 1914)
Miles v. Justice's Court of Pasadena Township
110 P. 349 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)