Ex Parte Woodhouse

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Woodhouse

1925 OK CR 574, 240 P. 1118, 32 Okla. Crim. 335, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 561

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 28, 1925

DocketNo. A-5800.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 574 (Ex Parte Woodhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Woodhouse, 1925 OK CR 574, 240 P. 1118, 32 Okla. Crim. 335, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 561 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for writ of *336 habeas corpus on behalf of Wilma Woodhouse for writ of habeas corpus, directed to J. A. Doyle, sheriff of Seminole county, filed in this court September 12, 1925. On the same day rule to show cause was issued, returnable September 16, 1925, at which time said sheriff filed his answer, showing that he was holding said petitioner under orders of Thos. O. Criswell, county judge of Seminole county, acting as a juvenile judge. Thereupon counsel of record for petitioner filed a motion to dismiss, and for grounds of such motion states: “That the said Wilma Woodhouse is no longer imprisoned and restrained of her liberty, by reason of the juvenile court’s revocation and modification of the commitment heretofore made and entered. Wherefore petitioner prays the judgment of the court dismissing said petition.” Thereupon it was ordered that said cause be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for writ of *336 habeas corpus on behalf of Wilma Woodhouse for writ of habeas corpus, directed to J. A. Doyle, sheriff of Seminole county, filed in this court September 12, 1925. On the same day rule to show cause was issued, returnable September 16, 1925, at which time said sheriff filed his answer, showing that he was holding said petitioner under orders of Thos. O. Criswell, county judge of Seminole county, acting as a juvenile judge. Thereupon counsel of record for petitioner filed a motion to dismiss, and for grounds of such motion states: “That the said Wilma Woodhouse is no longer imprisoned and restrained of her liberty, by reason of the juvenile court’s revocation and modification of the commitment heretofore made and entered. Wherefore petitioner prays the judgment of the court dismissing said petition.” Thereupon it was ordered that said cause be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 574, 240 P. 1118, 32 Okla. Crim. 335, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-woodhouse-oklacrimapp-1925.