Ex Parte Wong

612 S.W.2d 548, 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 907
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 18, 1981·No. 67084·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

This is an application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus which was submitted to this Court by the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Art. 11.07, V.A.C. C.P.

Petitioner was convicted of the offense of possession of cocaine, a controlled substance, in Cause No. 50,717 in the 147th Judicial District Court of Travis County. Punishment was assessed at imprisonment for 4 years probated.

Petitioner contends that the indictment in this case is fundamentally defective because it fails to allege an offense. A fundamentally defective indictment is subject to collateral attack. Ex parte Charles, 582 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).

On the date alleged and proved, cocaine was not specifically named in a penalty group of the Controlled Substances Act. Art. 4476-15, V.A.C.S. Therefore, the indictment failed to state an offense. Crowl v. State, 611 S.W.2d 59 (1980); Taylor v. State, 610 S.W.2d 471 (1981). Petitioner is thus entitled to relief.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 50,717 is set aside and the *549 indictment is ordered dismissed. Petitioner is ordered discharged from all further confinement under this conviction. A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Texas Department of Corrections.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

McCORMICK, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Wong, 612 S.W.2d 548, 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 907 (Tex. 1981).

612 S.W.2d 548 (Ex Parte Wong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitehead v. State
710 S.W.2d 645 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Fisher v. State
681 S.W.2d 202 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Moss v. State
617 S.W.2d 268 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Coronado v. State
617 S.W.2d 265 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)