Ex parte Womack

Ohio Supreme Court

Ex parte Womack

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 392

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 28, 1960

DocketNo. 36493

StatusPublished

This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 392 (Ex parte Womack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Womack, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 392 (Ohio 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Habeas corpus may not be employed as a substitute for the remedy of appeal or as a means for testing the constitutionality of a statute in favor of one who has been convicted, where the court wherein conviction was obtained had jurisdiction to determine the question of constitutionality. Yutze v. Copelan, Chief of Police, 109 Ohio St., 171; Ex parte Calhoun, 154 Ohio St., 81.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. • J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Habeas corpus may not be employed as a substitute for the remedy of appeal or as a means for testing the constitutionality of a statute in favor of one who has been convicted, where the court wherein conviction was obtained had jurisdiction to determine the question of constitutionality. Yutze v. Copelan, Chief of Police, 109 Ohio St., 171; Ex parte Calhoun, 154 Ohio St., 81.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. • J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-womack-ohio-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack