Ex parte Wilson

374 S.W.2d 892, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 18, 1963
DocketNo. 36300
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 374 S.W.2d 892 (Ex parte Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Wilson, 374 S.W.2d 892, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824 (Tex. 1963).

Opinions

BELCHER, Commissioner.

By writ of habeas corpus filed in the County Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, the appellant attacks as void the judgment of conviction for the offense of negligent collision as defined by Ordinance No. 41-39 of the City of Houston.

Appellant was convicted in the Corporation Court of the City of Houston under a complaint charging the offense of negligent collision and fined $25. Upon his appeal to the County Court at Law No. 1 he was again convicted and assessed a fine of $5. It is from confinement by virtue of a commitment issued under said judgment that appellant applied for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was granted, and after a hearing the appellant was remanded to custody, and from such order he appeals.

It is contended that Subsection A of Ordinance No. 41-39 of the City of Houston, upon which this conviction rests, is void upon the grounds it defines the same offense as is defined in Art. 827a, Sec. 8, Subsec. 1(a), Vernon’s Ann.P.C., but prescribes a different punishment.

It is apparent that an essential element of the offense defined by the ordinance is a collision caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle in the manner prohibited by said ordinance.

Art. 827a, Sec. 8, Subsec. 1(a), V.A.P.C., regulates only the speed of motor vehicles on a public highway.

The foregoing ordinance and article are each applicable to a different set of facts. Therefore appellant’s contention cannot be sustained. Ex parte Dickson, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 117, 261 S.W.2d 709; Ex parte Mooney, 106 Tex.Cr.R. 156, 291 S.W. 246.

The ordinance not being in conflict with Sec. 8 of Art. 827a, V.A.P.C., or any other penal statute which has been called to our attention, the trial judge did not err in remanding appellant to custody.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wingate v. State
383 S.W.2d 601 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 S.W.2d 892, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-wilson-texcrimapp-1963.