Ex Parte Wilson

117 S.W. 1197, 56 Tex. Crim. 1, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 146
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 1909
DocketNo. 4618.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 117 S.W. 1197 (Ex Parte Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Wilson, 117 S.W. 1197, 56 Tex. Crim. 1, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 146 (Tex. 1909).

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was arrested for violating an ordinance, entitled “An ordinance regulating the standing of move wagons, express wagons, hacks and other vehicles let for hire upon the public streets of the city of Dallas, providing for a license and prescribing a penalty.”

Complaint was filed against appellant charging that he unlawfully used and occupied a portion of a public street as a public stand within certain hounds, namely, Akard Street, between Commerce Street and Main Street, between the. hours of 8 o’clock a. m. and 7 o’clock p. m., by having and keeping thereon a vehicle for hire, to wit: a public hack and vehicle, and further charged him with having used said portion of said street for said purpose and appropriated the same, etc.

Appellant sued out a writ of habeas corpus before the honorable County Court of Dallas County, and upon hearing of said writ of *6 habeas corpus before the County Court he was remanded to custody, and from which judgment he appeals to this court.

[Rehearing denied April 14, 1909.—Reporter.]

This case in all of its bearings is an exact counterpart of the case that was decided by the Court of Civil Appeals of this State in the opinion rendered in the case of Kissinger et al. v. Hay et al., 113 S. W. Rep., 1005. There, in a very exhaustive, accurate and proper decision of all of the questions here raised, the court held against all of appellant’s contentions. We adopt said decision as the opinion of this court on the questions herein raised, and appellant is therefore remanded to the custody of the officer.

The judgment is in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson, Charles Clay
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Ex Parte Sullivan
178 S.W. 537 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Ex Parte Cramer
136 S.W. 61 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Ex Parte Denny
129 S.W. 1115 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.W. 1197, 56 Tex. Crim. 1, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-wilson-texcrimapp-1909.