Ex Parte Williams

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex Parte Williams

132 S.W.2d 411, 137 Tex. Crim. 514, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 500

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ex Parte Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Tex. Crim. 116 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 25, 1939·No. No. 20695.·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The question presented by this record is identical with that presented by the case of Ex Parte Gussie Ferguson, No. 20,714, (page 494 of this volume) this day decided by us.

For the reasons assigned by the Court in that opinion, relator is ordered discharged.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The question presented by this record is identical with that presented by the case of Ex Parte Gussie Ferguson, No. 20,714, (page 494 of this volume) this day decided by us.

For the reasons assigned by the Court in that opinion, relator is ordered discharged.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Ex Parte Williams, 132 S.W.2d 411, 137 Tex. Crim. 514, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 500 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

132 S.W.2d 411 (Ex Parte Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.