Ex Parte Williams

205 S.W. 943, 84 Tex. Crim. 131, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 308
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 23, 1918·No. No. 5175.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was duly indicted for the murder of Hal St. Clair. He sued out a.habeas corpus seeking bail. The court heard the evidence and denied bail, from which he appeals.

There is no bill of exceptions in the record. It is stated in the ■statement of facts that appellant objected to certain testimony, but there is no bill showing this, and nothing showing that the court approved any such bill, or any bill at all. The evidence heard was amply sufficient to justify the court to deny bail.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Williams, 205 S.W. 943, 84 Tex. Crim. 131, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 308 (Tex. 1918).

205 S.W. 943 (Ex Parte Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex parte Sims
565 S.W.2d 45 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)