Home/Supreme Court/Ex parte Williams

Ex parte Williams

317 U.S. 604, 63 S. Ct. 431, 87 L. Ed. 491, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1070
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 4, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 317 U.S. 604 (Ex parte Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Williams, 317 U.S. 604, 63 S. Ct. 431, 87 L. Ed. 491, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1070 (1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It does not appear that petitioners have exhausted their remedies under state law, especially in view of their failure to file an original application for habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Nebraska as is permissible under state law (Nebraska Compiled Statutes, 1929, § 27-204; In re White, 33 Neb. 812, 814, 51 N. W. 287), nor does it appear that the question presented here has been considered on the merits by the Supreme Court of Nebraska in any prior proceeding. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed v. Buchanan
188 F.2d 521 (Sixth Circuit, 1951)
Carr v. Burford, Warden
188 F.2d 159 (Tenth Circuit, 1951)
Darr v. Burford
339 U.S. 200 (Supreme Court, 1950)
United States ex rel. Keener v. Foust
84 F. Supp. 939 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1949)
Estep v. United States
327 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Ex parte Roberts
61 F. Supp. 864 (W.D. Virginia, 1945)
Ex parte Abernathy
320 U.S. 219 (Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
317 U.S. 604, 63 S. Ct. 431, 87 L. Ed. 491, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-williams-scotus-1943.