Ex parte Williams

Supreme Court

Ex parte Williams

317 U.S. 604, 63 S. Ct. 431, 87 L. Ed. 491, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1070

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 4, 1943·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It does not appear that petitioners have exhausted their remedies under state law, especially in view of their failure to file an original application for habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Nebraska as is permissible under state law (Nebraska Compiled Statutes, 1929, § 27-204; In re White, 33 Neb. 812, 814, 51 N. W. 287), nor does it appear that the question presented here has been considered on the merits by the Supreme Court of Nebraska in any prior proceeding. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

It does not appear that petitioners have exhausted their remedies under state law, especially in view of their failure to file an original application for habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Nebraska as is permissible under state law (Nebraska Compiled Statutes, 1929, § 27-204; In re White, 33 Neb. 812, 814, 51 N. W. 287), nor does it appear that the question presented here has been considered on the merits by the Supreme Court of Nebraska in any prior proceeding. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied without prejudice.

Ex parte Williams, 317 U.S. 604, 63 S. Ct. 431, 87 L. Ed. 491, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1070 (1943).

Pincite

317 U.S. 604 (Ex parte Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related