Ex Parte Williams

82 S.E. 402, 98 S.C. 211, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 20
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 16, 1914·No. 8885·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

.This is an appeal from an order of Special Judge Ramage in affirming the judgment of the probate Court in appointing J. W. Mahoney administrator of the estate of James Williams, deceased, instead of the appellant, J. R. Williams, Jr.

1 2 The exceptions allege error-on the part of the trial Judge in not submitting issues to the jury-as asked for on the part of the appellant, as to the question of marriage of the deceased to two women, and which one was his lawful wife, and who were his legitimate children. The exceptions are overruled for the reason that the appellant failed to comply with rule 28 of the Circuit Court; and we have a concurrent finding of the probate Court and Circuit Court as to the facts involved and under the authority of Ex parte Smalls, 69 S. C. 43, 48 S. E. 40; Ex parte Frierson, 96 S. C. 34, 79 S. E. 791. Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Williams, 82 S.E. 402, 98 S.C. 211, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 20 (S.C. 1914).

82 S.E. 402 (Ex Parte Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Small
48 S.E. 40 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1904)
Ex Parte Frierson
79 S.E. 791 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1913)