Ex Parte Williams

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Ex Parte Williams

82 S.E. 402, 98 S.C. 211, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 20

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJuly 16, 1914

Docket8885

StatusPublished

This text of 82 S.E. 402 (Ex Parte Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Williams, 82 S.E. 402, 98 S.C. 211, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 20 (S.C. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

.This is an appeal from an order of Special Judge Ramage in affirming the judgment of the probate Court in appointing J. W. Mahoney administrator of the estate of James Williams, deceased, instead of the appellant, J. R. Williams, Jr.

1 2 The exceptions allege error-on the part of the trial Judge in not submitting issues to the jury-as asked for on the part of the appellant, as to the question of marriage of the deceased to two women, and which one was his lawful wife, and who were his legitimate children. The exceptions are overruled for the reason that the appellant failed to comply with rule 28 of the Circuit Court; and we have a concurrent finding of the probate Court and Circuit Court as to the facts involved and under the authority of Ex parte Smalls, 69 S. C. 43, 48 S. E. 40; Ex parte Frierson, 96 S. C. 34, 79 S. E. 791. Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

.This is an appeal from an order of Special Judge Ramage in affirming the judgment of the probate Court in appointing J. W. Mahoney administrator of the estate of James Williams, deceased, instead of the appellant, J. R. Williams, Jr.

1 2 The exceptions allege error-on the part of the trial Judge in not submitting issues to the jury-as asked for on the part of the appellant, as to the question of marriage of the deceased to two women, and which one was his lawful wife, and who were his legitimate children. The exceptions are overruled for the reason that the appellant failed to comply with rule 28 of the Circuit Court; and we have a concurrent finding of the probate Court and Circuit Court as to the facts involved and under the authority of Ex parte Smalls, 69 S. C. 43, 48 S. E. 40; Ex parte Frierson, 96 S. C. 34, 79 S. E. 791. Judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 S.E. 402, 98 S.C. 211, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-williams-sc-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack