Ex Parte Wiggins

1928 OK CR 215, 267 P. 868, 40 Okla. Crim. 189, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 162
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 31, 1928
DocketNo. A-7035.
StatusPublished

This text of 1928 OK CR 215 (Ex Parte Wiggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Wiggins, 1928 OK CR 215, 267 P. 868, 40 Okla. Crim. 189, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 162 (Okla. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner, in substance,^ alleges that he is illegally restrained of his liberty by Ben B. Dancy, sheriif of Oklahoma county, setting out that a charge of felony, the crime of incest, had been filed against petitioner before A. W. McWilliams, a justice of the peace of Oklahoma county, and that thereafter the proceeding was transmitted to the district court of Oklahoma county without petitioner having had or waived a preliminary; that petitioner had duly challenged the jurisdiction of the district court by motion to quash, which had been overruled, and thereafter petitioner was tried in the district court, and had been sentenced to serve a term of five years in the state penitentiary; that the district court was without jurisdiction in said cause, and restraint of petitioner illegal. A rule to show cause was issued in this court. The sheriff has filed his return and a hearing had, at which there was introduced in evidence a transcript of the proceedings and the files and records in said cause.

The record discloses that petitioner was duly charged before a justice of the peace; that he appeared by his counsel, John J. Carney, a member of the bar, waived a preliminary; that a certified copy of the transcript was duly filed in the district court. These records import verity, and from them it is clearly made to appear that the district court had jurisdiction of the case, and that the restraint of petitioner is legal.

The application for writ of habeas corpus is denied, and the ease dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1928 OK CR 215, 267 P. 868, 40 Okla. Crim. 189, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-wiggins-oklacrimapp-1928.