Ex Parte Whorton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Whorton

106 So. 344, 214 Ala. 68, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 522

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 25, 1925

Docket7 Div. 587.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 So. 344 (Ex Parte Whorton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Whorton, 106 So. 344, 214 Ala. 68, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 522 (Ala. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

Consideration of the objections taken against the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case would necessarily involve consideration of the facts shown in the bill of exceptions. This court has repeatedly held that it will not on such applications look to the facts shown by the bill of exceptions. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. Following this rule, it is evident that the .opinion of the Court of Appeals is not open to review in this cause.

Certiorari denied.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAYRE, J.

Consideration of the objections taken against the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case would necessarily involve consideration of the facts shown in the bill of exceptions. This court has repeatedly held that it will not on such applications look to the facts shown by the bill of exceptions. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. Following this rule, it is evident that the .opinion of the Court of Appeals is not open to review in this cause.

Certiorari denied.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 344, 214 Ala. 68, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-whorton-ala-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack