Ex Parte Whorton
106 So. 344, 214 Ala. 68, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 522
Opinion
Consideration of the objections taken against the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case would necessarily involve consideration of the facts shown in the bill of exceptions. This court has repeatedly held that it will not on such applications look to the facts shown by the bill of exceptions. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. Following this rule, it is evident that the .opinion of the Court of Appeals is not open to review in this cause.
Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Whorton, 106 So. 344, 214 Ala. 68, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 522 (Ala. 1925).
106 So. 344 (Ex Parte Whorton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Prichard v. Harold
186 So. 504 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)