Ex Parte White

1931 OK CR 98, 296 P. 756, 50 Okla. Crim. 163, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 80
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 6, 1931
DocketNo. A-8004.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1931 OK CR 98 (Ex Parte White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte White, 1931 OK CR 98, 296 P. 756, 50 Okla. Crim. 163, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 80 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The defendant filled his original petition in this court on October 9, 1930, alleging that on or about the..day of., 1928, he was convicted in the county court of an offense of illegal possession of intoxicating liquor, and sentenced to a term of 60 days in county jail, and to pay a fine of $150; that he appealed his case to the Criminal Court of Appeals, which *164 judgment was affirmed by the Criminal Court of Appeals, on the.day of January, 1930; that the mandate from said Criminal Court of Appeals was received and filed in the clerk’s office of the county court on the 18th day of February, 1930, the said petitioner was taken before the federal court, and was by said court sentenced to a term of six months’ imprisonment, to be confined in the said county jail of Oklahoma county, in custody of Stanley Rogers, sheriff of Oklahoma county; that the sheriff of said county has custody of the petitioner, and he is confined in said common jail of said county.

Petitioner further alleges that the term of imprisonment and fine and costs on behalf of the state have been served by said petitioner, and the term of imprisonment by the federal court has been served; that the two terms of imprisonment must and did run concurrently by operation of law. The statement made by petitioner shows that the sentences imposed upon him were imposed by courts having different jurisdiction; therefore the sentences could not run concurrently.

The writ is denied.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clanton v. State
1968 OK CR 197 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1968)
Delk v. Commonwealth
285 S.W.2d 169 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1955)
Ex Parte Adams
1950 OK CR 154 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1950)
Ex Parte Gilbert
1931 OK CR 471 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1931 OK CR 98, 296 P. 756, 50 Okla. Crim. 163, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-white-oklacrimapp-1931.