Ex parte Whistler

154 F.2d 500, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2072
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 6, 1946
DocketNo. 8953
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 154 F.2d 500 (Ex parte Whistler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Whistler, 154 F.2d 500, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2072 (7th Cir. 1946).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in forma pauperis in a habeas corpus case wherein the Attorney General of Wisconsin has moved to dismiss the appeal because of the lack of a certificate of probable cause and because of the failure of petitioner to exhaust state court remedies.

The Facts. Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment, in 1933, by a Wisconsin state court, for the murder of his sweetheart. He alleges he made application for habeas corpus to the lower Wisconsin courts and to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, but he made no application for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court from any of these decisions which denied his application for writs of habeas corpus.

United States District Judge Duffy reviewed the facts and the law in the instant case in a careful opinion and denied the habeas corpus. 65 F.Supp. 40.

Appellant’s basis for habeas ' corpus seems to be that such waiver of jury trial as he made was illegal. He also objects to his sanity trial being held contemporaneous with the murder trial. He objects because his criminal sentence states the killing was “without any excuse or justification of any kind” whereas he informed the District Attorney of the precise nature of the dispute with his girl friend.

It seems clear that the appeal must be dismissed for lack of a certificates of probable cause. Although not requested so to do, both of us have considered the record, and each of us finds ourself unable and unwilling to sign this necessary certificate of probable cause.

The appeal is Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Hiatt
79 F. Supp. 433 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 F.2d 500, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-whistler-ca7-1946.