Ex parte Wheeler

162 So. 2d 889, 42 Ala. App. 302
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1964·No. 4 Div. 507·Published

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Ground 4 of the Attorney General’s motion to strike Wheeler’s petition to this court is well taken. No allegation is made that Wheeler appealed or tried to give notice of appeal from the averred judgment dismissing his application to the Circuit Court of Covington County for coram nobis. See Allen v. State, 42 Ala.App. 9, 150 So.2d 399; Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837.

Motion granted; petition stricken; cause dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Wheeler, 162 So. 2d 889, 42 Ala. App. 302 (Ala. Ct. App. 1964).

162 So. 2d 889 (Ex parte Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fay v. Noia
372 U.S. 391 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Allen v. State
150 So. 2d 399 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1963)