Ex parte Webb

329 S.W.2d 435, 168 Tex. Crim. 495, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2629
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 2, 1959·No. No. 31,121·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

This is an original application for habeas corpus in behalf of a convict, attacking the judgment of conviction against him as void.

The judgment recites that appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of felony theft and waived a jury trial, and that the trial judge assessed as punishment “confinement in the State Penitentiary for a term of two to five years.”

Unless there be a clerical error in the entry of such judgment, it is void because no definite punishment has been assessed. Ex parte East, 154 Texas Cr. Rep. 123, 225 S.W. 2d 833; Ex parte Traxler, 147 Texas Cr. Rep. 661, 184 S.W. 2d 286; Ex parte Frazier, 164 Texas Cr. Rep. 572, 301 S.W. 2d 655; Ex parte Hannen, 155 Texas Cr. Rep. 10, 228 S.W. 2d 864.

In the absence of a definite punishment being assessed, the maximum term to be stated in the sentence could not be ascertained.

The application is granted. Relator is ordered relieved from further confinement in the penitentiary and delivered to the custody of the sheriff of Hill County, Texas, to answer in the district court of said county to the indictment in Cause No. 20,709 under which the conviction was had.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Webb, 329 S.W.2d 435, 168 Tex. Crim. 495, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2629 (Tex. 1959).

329 S.W.2d 435 (Ex parte Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Nicholson v. Boles
134 S.E.2d 576 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1964)
State v. Boles
134 S.E.2d 576 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1964)