Ex Parte Watson
This text of 288 S.W. 210 (Ex Parte Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Relator is under indictment for murder charged with killing Jack McMath. Upon habeas corpus hearing before the Judge of the Thirty-fifth Judicial District bail *260 was denied, from which order this appeal is prosecuted. The killing occurred on the public street in Coleman. The meeting between the parties was brought about by deceased. His manner in accosting relator was such as caused a party who was with relator in his automobile to leave the car, anticipating trouble. Proof is also in the record before us that deceased had some two weeks before the homicide made threats to kill relator unless he left town. The exact threats had not been communicated, but relator had been advised to keep away from deceased to avoid trouble. We think it unnecessary to set out the evidence in detail. From a careful examination of it we are not impressed that the state has shown by proof evident a killing upon express malice which has been held necessary before bail can properly be denied. Ex Parte Francis, 91 Tex. Crim. Rep. 398, 239 S. W. 957; Ex Parte Hicks, 95 Tex. Crim. Rep. 450, 254 S. W. 1109.
Judgment remanding relator without bail is reversed, and bail granted in the sum of $7,500.
Reversed and bail granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 S.W. 210, 105 Tex. Crim. 259, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-watson-texcrimapp-1926.