Ex parte Watkins

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ex parte Watkins

168 So. 2d 627, 42 Ala. App. 495

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 3, 1964·No. 5 Div. 641·Published

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Petition for writ of error to be directed to the Lee Circuit Court.

According to the scant allegations error is claimed because neither of the two in-formations filed- against the petitioner make out a felony. Watkins seems to have waived indictment and plead guilty.

The Attorney General moves us to strike because petitioner had theretofore sued out an appeal. This ground is well taken.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CATES, Judge.

Petition for writ of error to be directed to the Lee Circuit Court.

According to the scant allegations error is claimed because neither of the two in-formations filed- against the petitioner make out a felony. Watkins seems to have waived indictment and plead guilty.

The Attorney General moves us to strike because petitioner had theretofore sued out an appeal. This ground is well taken.

Petition dismissed.

Ex parte Watkins, 168 So. 2d 627, 42 Ala. App. 495 (Ala. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

168 So. 2d 627 (Ex parte Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.