Ex parte Walpole

24 P. 308, 84 Cal. 584, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 846
California Supreme Court·Decided June 17, 1890·No. No. 20710·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

The Court.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus, on the ground that the petitioner has been held to answer on a criminal charge before the superior court without reasonable or probable cause.

The petition does not show what the charge is upon which he has been committed, but does allege that there is no evidence whatever taken upon his preliminary examination showing or tending to show that he is guilty of any offense whatever. But this is merely his conclusion, and it may be an erroneous conclusion.

A petition for habeas corpus must be verified, and must allege facts showing an illegal imprisonment. When the ground of the petition is, that the prisoner has been committed without reasonable or probable cause, it must set out what the evidence on the examination was, in such form that perjury may be assigned upon the allegations if they are false.

Writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Walpole, 24 P. 308, 84 Cal. 584, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 846 (Cal. 1890).

24 P. 308 (Ex parte Walpole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

(HC) Silva v. Patterson
E.D. California, 2021
In Re Clark
855 P.2d 729 (California Supreme Court, 1993)
People v. McCarthy
176 Cal. App. 3d 593 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)
People v. Madaris
122 Cal. App. 3d 234 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)
In Re Connor
108 P.2d 10 (California Supreme Court, 1940)
Ex parte Lapique
72 P. 995 (California Supreme Court, 1903)
Wall v. Mines
62 P. 386 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
State ex rel. Sherin v. Goss
75 N.W. 1132 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1898)
Ex parte Buckley
38 P. 686 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
Ex parte Estrado
26 P. 209 (California Supreme Court, 1891)