Ex Parte Wallace & Barron

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Ex Parte Wallace & Barron

120 S.E. 756, 127 S.C. 60, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 119

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 3, 1924·No. 11389·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court refusing to set aside the taxation of costs by the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas against the appellants, Wallace & Barron, and the estate of George S. Mower, deceased. The history of the litigation is set forth in the order of the Circuit Judge. Eet it be reported. The conclusions of the Circuit Judge are entirely satisfactory. The remittitur from this Court went to the Circuit Court, where orders in conformity with the judgment should have been and doubtless were taken. *64 It was entirely proper, therefore,, for the Clerk of that Court to tax the appeal costs.

The judgment of this Court is .that the order appealed from be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court refusing to set aside the taxation of costs by the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas against the appellants, Wallace & Barron, and the estate of George S. Mower, deceased. The history of the litigation is set forth in the order of the Circuit Judge. Eet it be reported. The conclusions of the Circuit Judge are entirely satisfactory. The remittitur from this Court went to the Circuit Court, where orders in conformity with the judgment should have been and doubtless were taken. *64 It was entirely proper, therefore,, for the Clerk of that Court to tax the appeal costs.

The judgment of this Court is .that the order appealed from be affirmed.

Ex Parte Wallace & Barron, 120 S.E. 756, 127 S.C. 60, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 119 (S.C. 1924).

Pincite

120 S.E. 756 (Ex Parte Wallace & Barron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.