Ex Parte Walker

152 So. 246, 228 Ala. 130, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 24
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 9, 1933
Docket7 Div. 153.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 152 So. 246 (Ex Parte Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Walker, 152 So. 246, 228 Ala. 130, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 24 (Ala. 1933).

Opinion

THOMAS, Justice.

The due procedure in like cases was recently considered by this court in Re Yon L. Thompson, ante, p. 113, 152 So. 229, and Ex Parte Robert G. Messer (Ala. App.) 152 So. 244.

The questions assigned for error and urged in argument by this petitioner-appellant go to the right of trial by jury, and were decided adversely to this petitioner in the recent case of In re Von L. Thompson, supra, sustaining the constitutionality of the Acts of 1923 and 1031. Acts 1923, p. 100; Acts 1931, p. 683.

The evidence offered at the trial sustained the judgment and conclusion announced by the bar commission. No error is found in that proceeding; however, exercising our supervisory powers, we think the punishment should be reduced to six months from this date; and it is so ordered.

The finding of the bar commission is so modified, and, as modified, is affirmed.

Modified and affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar
225 So. 2d 829 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1969)
Ex Parte Newton
93 So. 2d 164 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
In Re Fite
152 So. 246 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 246, 228 Ala. 130, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-walker-ala-1933.