Ex parte Van Hoeston

Nevada Supreme Court

Ex parte Van Hoeston

33 Nev. 320

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1910·No. No. 1905·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In an opinion in case No. 1903, filed this date, entitled “In the Matter of the Application of R. A. Davis for a Writ of Habeas Corpus,” the questions involved and the law applicable thereto are the same as those involved in the above-entitled case. Upon the authority of said case, and for reasons given therein, the petitioner in the present case is discharged.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

In an opinion in case No. 1903, filed this date, entitled “In the Matter of the Application of R. A. Davis for a Writ of Habeas Corpus,” the questions involved and the law applicable thereto are the same as those involved in the above-entitled case. Upon the authority of said case, and for reasons given therein, the petitioner in the present case is discharged.

It is so ordered.

Ex parte Van Hoeston, 33 Nev. 320 (Neb. 1910).

Pincite

33 Nev. 320 (Ex parte Van Hoeston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.