Ex Parte Valdez

158 S.W.3d 438, 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1830, 2004 WL 2538847
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 10, 2004
DocketAP75039
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 158 S.W.3d 438 (Ex Parte Valdez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Valdez, 158 S.W.3d 438, 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1830, 2004 WL 2538847 (Tex. 2004).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In his subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus, applicant claimed that he is mentally retarded. We determined that applicant had met the requirements of Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, § 5, and we remanded to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing and found that applicant is mentally retarded. The record supports the trial court’s findings. Ex parte Briseno, 135 S.W.3d 1 (Tex.Crim.App.2004). Accordingly, we grant relief. We reform applicant’s sentence to life imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Alstyne, Ex Parte Gregory
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007
Ex Parte Van Alstyne
239 S.W.3d 815 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 S.W.3d 438, 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1830, 2004 WL 2538847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-valdez-texcrimapp-2004.